Chadsey-Rusch J, Linneman D, Rylance B J
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA.
Am J Ment Retard. 1997 Jul;102(1):1-12. doi: 10.1352/0895-8017(1997)102<0001:BASIFT>2.0.CO;2.
Beliefs of multiple stakeholders who were all part of the same "transition community" (including persons with mental retardation, job coaches, and employers) about social integration outcomes and interventions in employment settings were examined. Data were collected through interviews and questionnaires that were designed based on a previously affirmed conceptual framework of social integration. Although results showed that stakeholders agreed on some outcomes and interventions they disagreed on others. These disagreements could be cause for concern because contrasting belief systems among stakeholders supposedly working toward the same goal might interfere with successful social integration in work settings for persons with mental retardation.
研究了属于同一“过渡社区”的多个利益相关者(包括智力障碍者、职业教练和雇主)对就业环境中的社会融合成果和干预措施的看法。数据通过访谈和问卷收集,这些访谈和问卷是根据先前确认的社会融合概念框架设计的。尽管结果表明利益相关者在一些成果和干预措施上达成了一致,但在其他方面存在分歧。这些分歧可能令人担忧,因为朝着同一目标努力的利益相关者之间相互矛盾的信念体系可能会干扰智力障碍者在工作环境中的成功社会融合。