Anderlini P, Körbling M, Dale D, Gratwohl A, Schmitz N, Stroncek D, Howe C, Leitman S, Horowitz M, Gluckman E, Rowley S, Przepiorka D, Champlin R
Blood. 1997 Aug 1;90(3):903-8.
Allogeneic transplantation of cytokine-mobilized peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) is now being increasingly performed, but safety considerations for hematologically normal PBSC donors have not been fully addressed. Progenitors are generally mobilized for collection from normal donors using recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rhG-CSF). Although the short-term safety profile of rhG-CSF seems acceptable, experience remains limited and its optimal dose and schedule have not been defined. Minimal data exist regarding long-term safety of rhG-CSF, primarily derived from experience in patients with chronic neutropenia or cancer. An "ad hoc" workshop was recently convened among a group of investigators actively involved in the field of allogeneic stem cell transplantation to discuss the safety issues pertaining to normal PBSC donors. There was agreement on the following points: (1) On the basis of available data, it appears that rhG-CSF treatment and PBSC collection have an acceptable short-term safety profile in normal donors. However, the need for continued safety monitoring was recognized. (2) rhG-CSF doses up to 10 microg/kg/d show a consistent dose-response relationship with the mobilization (and collection) of CD34+ progenitor cells, and this dose is acceptable for routine clinical use. Whether higher doses are superior (or cost effective) remains to be determined, and they may produce more severe side effects. The potential risks of marked leukocytosis (arbitrarily defined as a leukocyte count of more than 70 x 10(9)/L) have been a concern, and rhG-CSF dose reduction is performed by many centers to maintain leukocyte counts below this level. (3) Transient post donation cytopenias, involving granulocytes, lymphocytes, and platelets, may occur and are at least partly related to the leukapheresis procedure. These are generally asymptomatic and self-limited; follow-up blood counts are not necessarily required. Reinfusion of autologous platelet-rich plasma should be considered for donors with expected postdonation thrombocytopenia (platelet count < 80 to 100 x 10(9)/L). (4) Donors should meet the eligibility criteria which apply to donors of apheresis platelets, with the exception that pediatric donors may also be considered. Any deviation from these criteria should have supporting documentation. There is insufficient information at this time to clearly establish definite contraindications for PBSC collection in a hematologically normal donor. Potential contraindications include the presence of inflammatory, autoimmune, or rheumatologic disorders, as well as atherosclerotic or cerebrovascular disease. (5) The creation of an International PBSC Donor Registry is desirable to facilitate monitoring the long-term effects of the procedure. Individual institutions or donor centers are encouraged to establish their own PBSC donor follow-up system, preferably with a standardized approach to data collection.
细胞因子动员的外周血干细胞(PBSC)同种异体移植目前越来越多地被开展,但血液学正常的PBSC供者的安全性问题尚未得到充分解决。通常使用重组人粒细胞集落刺激因子(rhG-CSF)从正常供者动员祖细胞以进行采集。虽然rhG-CSF的短期安全性似乎可以接受,但经验仍然有限,其最佳剂量和方案尚未确定。关于rhG-CSF长期安全性的数据极少,主要来自慢性中性粒细胞减少症患者或癌症患者的经验。最近,一组积极参与同种异体干细胞移植领域的研究人员召开了一次“特别”研讨会,讨论与正常PBSC供者相关的安全问题。就以下几点达成了共识:(1)根据现有数据,rhG-CSF治疗和PBSC采集在正常供者中似乎具有可接受的短期安全性。然而,认识到需要持续进行安全性监测。(2)高达10μg/kg/d的rhG-CSF剂量与CD34+祖细胞的动员(和采集)呈现一致的剂量反应关系,该剂量可用于常规临床应用。更高剂量是否更优(或更具成本效益)仍有待确定,且可能产生更严重的副作用。明显白细胞增多(任意定义为白细胞计数超过70×10⁹/L)的潜在风险一直是个问题,许多中心会降低rhG-CSF剂量以将白细胞计数维持在该水平以下。(3)捐献后可能出现涉及粒细胞、淋巴细胞和血小板的短暂血细胞减少,且至少部分与白细胞分离术有关。这些通常无症状且为自限性;不一定需要进行后续血细胞计数。对于预计捐献后血小板减少(血小板计数<80至100×10⁹/L)的供者,应考虑回输自体富含血小板血浆。(4)供者应符合适用于单采血小板供者的合格标准,但儿科供者也可考虑。任何偏离这些标准的情况都应有支持性文件。目前尚无足够信息明确确定血液学正常供者进行PBSC采集的明确禁忌证。潜在禁忌证包括存在炎症性、自身免疫性或风湿性疾病,以及动脉粥样硬化或脑血管疾病。(5)建立国际PBSC供者登记处很有必要,以促进对该操作长期影响的监测。鼓励各机构或供者中心建立自己的PBSC供者随访系统,最好采用标准化的数据收集方法。