Suppr超能文献

文拉法辛在普通医疗中治疗抑郁症的疗效。

Efficacy of venlafaxine in depressive illness in general practice.

作者信息

Lecrubier Y, Bourin M, Moon C A, Schifano F, Blanchard C, Danjou P, Hackett D

机构信息

Hôpital La Pitié-Salpétrière, Paris, France.

出版信息

Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1997 Jun;95(6):485-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1997.tb10136.x.

Abstract

A double-blind, placebo-controlled study of 229 patients with a Research Diagnostic Criteria diagnosis of major, minor or intermittent depression was used to compare the clinical profiles of venlafaxine and imipramine in general practice. Venlafaxine produced a significant improvement compared to placebo in symptoms of depression and anxiety as rated by the total MADRS and percentage of responders, the CGI improvement, the CGI severity of illness, the BSA psychic anxiety item and the HSCL. On a number of these measures, venlafaxine was also significantly more effective than imipramine. Venlafaxine was significantly superior to both imipramine and placebo for the SARS total score and the items 'social/leisure' and 'extended family.' A similar proportion of patients discontinued treatment in each group, but fewer patients on venlafaxine discontinued treatment because of an unsatisfactory response.

摘要

一项针对229名符合研究诊断标准中重度、轻度或间歇性抑郁症诊断的患者进行的双盲、安慰剂对照研究,用于比较文拉法辛和丙咪嗪在全科医疗中的临床特征。与安慰剂相比,文拉法辛在抑郁和焦虑症状方面有显著改善,这通过总MADRS评分、有效率百分比、CGI改善情况、CGI疾病严重程度、BSA精神焦虑项目和HSCL来评定。在这些指标中的多项上,文拉法辛也比丙咪嗪显著更有效。文拉法辛在SARS总分以及“社交/休闲”和“大家庭”项目上显著优于丙咪嗪和安慰剂。每组中停止治疗的患者比例相似,但因疗效不佳而停止治疗的文拉法辛患者较少。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验