• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

A randomized, double-blind comparison of a rapidly escalating dose of venlafaxine and imipramine in inpatients with major depression and melancholia.

作者信息

Benkert O, Gründer G, Wetzel H, Hackett D

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, University of Mainz, Germany.

出版信息

J Psychiatr Res. 1996 Nov-Dec;30(6):441-51. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3956(96)00029-5.

DOI:10.1016/s0022-3956(96)00029-5
PMID:9023787
Abstract

A double-blind, randomized, parallel study in 167 hospitalized patients with major depression and melancholia was conducted to determine if rapidly escalated doses of venlafaxine produced an earlier response, compared with rapidly escalated doses of imipramine. The daily dose of venlafaxine was rapidly increased to 375 mg/day over a five-day period, was maintained at this level for 10 days, and then was reduced to 150 mg/day for the remainder of the study. The imipramine dose was rapidly increased to 200 mg/day over five days and was maintained at this level to the end of the study. The primary efficacy variables were time to response and time to sustained response on the HAM-D and MADRS. No differences in the response rates on the HAM-D or MADRS were observed between treatments. However, among patients who demonstrated a response on the HAM-D, there was a significantly faster onset of response (p = 0.036) and sustained response (p = 0.018) in the venlafaxine group. The median time to response on the HAM-D among responders was 14 days with venlafaxine and 21 days with imipramine. However, no differences between treatments were observed among responders on the MADRS (median time to response: 15 days for venlafaxine, 18 days for imipramine). Study events were reported in 69% of venlafaxine-treated patients and 76% of imipramine-treated patients. In severely depressed patients with melancholia, a faster onset of response was observed with venlafaxine on the HAM-D, but not the MADRS, and maximal tolerated doses of venlafaxine and imipramine were comparable for overall efficacy. These results confirm and extend previous observations and suggest that venlafaxine may have an early onset of action and may produce a rapid response in hospitalized patients with severe depression complicated by melancholia.

摘要

相似文献

1
A randomized, double-blind comparison of a rapidly escalating dose of venlafaxine and imipramine in inpatients with major depression and melancholia.
J Psychiatr Res. 1996 Nov-Dec;30(6):441-51. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3956(96)00029-5.
2
Mirtazapine versus venlafaxine in hospitalized severely depressed patients with melancholic features.米氮平与文拉法辛治疗伴有抑郁特征的住院重度抑郁症患者的疗效比较
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2001 Aug;21(4):425-31. doi: 10.1097/00004714-200108000-00010.
3
A double-blind comparison of venlafaxine and fluoxetine in patients hospitalized for major depression and melancholia. The Venlafaxine French Inpatient Study Group.文拉法辛与氟西汀治疗重度抑郁和 melancholia 住院患者的双盲对照研究。文拉法辛法国住院患者研究组。
Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 1994 Sep;9(3):139-43. doi: 10.1097/00004850-199409000-00001.
4
Double-blind comparison of venlafaxine and amitriptyline in outpatients with major depression with or without melancholia.文拉法辛与阿米替林治疗伴或不伴 melancholia 的重度抑郁症门诊患者的双盲对照研究
J Psychopharmacol. 2000 Mar;14(1):61-6. doi: 10.1177/026988110001400108.
5
Increased remission rates with venlafaxine compared with fluoxetine in hospitalized patients with major depression and melancholia.与氟西汀相比,文拉法辛用于住院的重度抑郁和 melancholia 患者时缓解率更高。
Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2000 Jan;15(1):29-34. doi: 10.1097/00004850-200015010-00004.
6
Mirtazapine orally disintegrating tablets versus venlafaxine extended release: a double-blind, randomized multicenter trial comparing the onset of antidepressant response in patients with major depressive disorder.米氮平口腔崩解片与文拉法辛缓释片对比:一项比较重度抑郁症患者抗抑郁反应起效时间的双盲、随机多中心试验。
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2006 Feb;26(1):75-8. doi: 10.1097/01.jcp.0000194622.99986.d6.
7
Comparison of venlafaxine and imipramine in depressive illness.
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1998 May;97(5):384-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1998.tb10019.x.
8
Once-daily venlafaxine extended release (XR) and venlafaxine immediate release (IR) in outpatients with major depression. Venlafaxine XR 208 Study Group.一日一次的文拉法辛缓释剂(XR)和文拉法辛速释剂(IR)用于门诊重度抑郁症患者。文拉法辛XR 208研究组。
Ann Clin Psychiatry. 1997 Sep;9(3):157-64. doi: 10.1023/a:1026277907818.
9
Efficacy and tolerability of once-daily venlafaxine extended release (XR) in outpatients with major depression. The Venlafaxine XR 209 Study Group.每日一次的文拉法辛缓释剂(XR)治疗门诊重度抑郁症患者的疗效及耐受性。文拉法辛XR 209研究组
J Clin Psychiatry. 1997 Sep;58(9):393-8. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v58n0904.
10
A randomized, double-blind, parallel-group comparison of venlafaxine and clomipramine in outpatients with major depression.文拉法辛与氯米帕明治疗门诊重性抑郁障碍患者的随机、双盲、平行组对照研究
J Psychopharmacol. 1998;12(3):273-8. doi: 10.1177/026988119801200307.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative change in P300 indices following antidepressant treatment in patients with major depressive disorder.重度抑郁症患者抗抑郁治疗后P300指标的比较变化。
Ind Psychiatry J. 2022 Jul-Dec;31(2):243-247. doi: 10.4103/ipj.ipj_214_21. Epub 2022 Aug 8.
2
Transcranial Direct-Current Stimulation (tDCS) Versus Venlafaxine ER In The Treatment Of Depression: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Single-Center Study With Open-Label, Follow-Up.经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)与文拉法辛缓释剂治疗抑郁症的随机、双盲、单中心开放标签随访研究
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2019 Oct 23;15:3003-3014. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S226577. eCollection 2019.
3
Deviation from intention to treat analysis in randomised trials and treatment effect estimates: meta-epidemiological study.
随机试验中意向性分析的偏离与治疗效果估计:Meta流行病学研究
BMJ. 2015 May 27;350:h2445. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h2445.
4
Imipramine is an orally active drug against both antimony sensitive and resistant Leishmania donovani clinical isolates in experimental infection.丙咪嗪是一种口服活性药物,对实验感染中敏感和耐药的利什曼原虫临床分离株均有作用。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2012;6(12):e1987. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001987. Epub 2012 Dec 27.
5
General and comparative efficacy and effectiveness of antidepressants in the acute treatment of depressive disorders: a report by the WPA section of pharmacopsychiatry.抗抑郁药在治疗抑郁障碍急性期的总体和比较疗效和效果:WPA 精神药理学分会报告。
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2011 Nov;261 Suppl 3:207-45. doi: 10.1007/s00406-011-0259-6.
6
Randomized comparison of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (escitalopram) monotherapy and antidepressant combination pharmacotherapy for major depressive disorder with melancholic features: a CO-MED report.伴有忧郁特征的重性抑郁障碍患者选择性 5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(艾司西酞普兰)单药治疗与抗抑郁药联合药物治疗的随机对照比较:一项 CO-MED 报告。
J Affect Disord. 2011 Oct;133(3):467-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2011.04.032. Epub 2011 May 23.
7
Transforming the psychiatric inpatient unit from short-term pseudo-asylum care to state-of-the-art treatment setting.将精神科住院部从短期的伪庇护所式护理转变为最先进的治疗环境。
Psychiatry (Edgmont). 2008 Sep;5(9):47-50.
8
The effect of venlafaxine compared with other antidepressants and placebo in the treatment of major depression: a meta-analysis.文拉法辛与其他抗抑郁药及安慰剂相比治疗重度抑郁症的疗效:一项荟萃分析。
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2009 Apr;259(3):172-85. doi: 10.1007/s00406-008-0849-0. Epub 2009 Jan 22.
9
Time course of clinical response to venlafaxine: relevance of plasma level and chirality.文拉法辛临床反应的时间进程:血药浓度及手性的相关性
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2004 Feb;59(12):883-91. doi: 10.1007/s00228-003-0710-3. Epub 2003 Dec 24.
10
Third-generation antidepressants: do they offer advantages over the SSRIs?第三代抗抑郁药:它们比选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRI)更具优势吗?
CNS Drugs. 2001;15(12):941-54. doi: 10.2165/00023210-200115120-00004.