• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

年轻人和年长者在拼图复制任务的三个版本上的表现比较。

Comparison of the performance of younger and older adults on three versions of a puzzle reproduction task.

作者信息

Katz N, Champagne D, Cermak S

机构信息

School of Occupational Therapy, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel.

出版信息

Am J Occup Ther. 1997 Jul-Aug;51(7):562-8. doi: 10.5014/ajot.51.7.562.

DOI:10.5014/ajot.51.7.562
PMID:9242863
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Because constructional ability is a crucial perceptual-motor skill that relates to daily functioning, it should be accurately assessed in clients with neurological dysfunction. This study examined three versions of the Puzzle Reproduction task (a constructional ability task) of the Loewenstein Occupational Therapy Cognitive Assessment (LOTCA) in order to determine whether a reduced-detail version of the task would be easier (i.e., require less time to complete) than the original version and whether a subplacement version would be more difficult to perform (i.e., require more time to complete) than the original version. In addition, the study examined whether older adult subjects would perform more slowly than younger adult subjects.

METHODS

Seventy-two right-handed adults with no disabilities were divided into two age groups: 18 to 30 years old (n = 36) and 58 to 70 years old (n = 36). Each subject was tested on one of three versions of the LOTCA Puzzle Reproduction task (i.e., original subplacement, simplified).

RESULTS

For the older subjects, the simplified version of the task required significantly less time than the original version, although there was not a significant time difference between the original and subplacement versions. For the younger subjects, the subplacement versions. required significantly more time than the original version, but there was no significant time difference between the original and simplified versions. Results also indicated that older subjects took significantly longer to perform all three versions of the task than did the younger subjects.

CONCLUSION

The findings support the use of the simplified version of the LOTCA Puzzle Reproduction task with older adults or with persons with major cognitive-perceptual difficulties. Further studies of the level of difficulty of the subplacement version are needed to examine whether this version is more sensitive to constructional deficits in a sample of person with neurological impairments because even mild constructional deficits have been shown to relate to disabilities in daily functioning.

摘要

目的

由于构建能力是一项与日常功能相关的关键感知运动技能,因此应在神经功能障碍患者中对其进行准确评估。本研究对洛温斯坦职业疗法认知评估(LOTCA)中的拼图复制任务(一项构建能力任务)的三个版本进行了测试,以确定该任务的简化版是否比原始版更简单(即完成所需时间更少),以及子放置版是否比原始版更难执行(即完成所需时间更多)。此外,该研究还考察了老年受试者的表现是否会比年轻成年受试者更慢。

方法

72名无残疾的右利手成年人被分为两个年龄组:18至30岁(n = 36)和58至70岁(n = 36)。每位受试者接受LOTCA拼图复制任务三个版本之一(即原始子放置版、简化版)的测试。

结果

对于老年受试者,任务的简化版所需时间明显少于原始版,尽管原始版和子放置版之间没有显著的时间差异。对于年轻受试者,子放置版所需时间明显多于原始版,但原始版和简化版之间没有显著的时间差异。结果还表明,老年受试者完成所有三个版本任务的时间明显长于年轻受试者。

结论

研究结果支持对老年人或有严重认知感知困难的人使用LOTCA拼图复制任务的简化版。需要对子放置版的难度水平进行进一步研究,以检验该版本对神经损伤患者样本中的构建缺陷是否更敏感,因为即使是轻微的构建缺陷也已被证明与日常功能障碍有关。

相似文献

1
Comparison of the performance of younger and older adults on three versions of a puzzle reproduction task.年轻人和年长者在拼图复制任务的三个版本上的表现比较。
Am J Occup Ther. 1997 Jul-Aug;51(7):562-8. doi: 10.5014/ajot.51.7.562.
2
Performance of Americans and israelis with cerebrovascular accident on the Loewenstein Occupational Therapy Cognitive Assessment (LOTCA).美国人和以色列人脑血管意外患者在洛温斯坦职业疗法认知评估(LOTCA)中的表现。
Am J Occup Ther. 1995 Jun;49(6):500-6. doi: 10.5014/ajot.49.6.500.
3
Applicability of the hierarchical scales of the Tufts Assessment of Motor Performance for school-aged children and adults with disabilities.塔夫茨运动能力评估分级量表在学龄儿童和残疾成人中的适用性。
Phys Ther. 1992 Mar;72(3):191-202; discussion 202-6. doi: 10.1093/ptj/72.3.191.
4
The Stroop task: comparison between the original paradigm and computerized versions in children and adults.斯特鲁普任务:儿童和成人原始范式与计算机化版本的比较。
Clin Neuropsychol. 2012;26(7):1142-53. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2012.713513. Epub 2012 Aug 28.
5
Effects of age and type of picture on visuospatial working memory assessed with a computerized jigsaw-puzzle task.年龄和图片类型对通过电脑拼图任务评估的视觉空间工作记忆的影响。
Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn. 2018 Nov;25(6):852-873. doi: 10.1080/13825585.2017.1377680. Epub 2017 Sep 15.
6
Elimination of the enhanced Simon effect for older adults in a three-choice situation: ageing and the Simon effect in a go/no-go Simon task.在三选一情境中消除老年人增强的西蒙效应:在停止信号西蒙任务中的衰老与西蒙效应
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2010 Mar;63(3):452-64. doi: 10.1080/17470210902990829.
7
A deficit in optimizing task solution but robust and well-retained speed and accuracy gains in complex skill acquisition in Parkinson׳s disease: multi-session training on the Tower of Hanoi Puzzle.帕金森病患者在优化任务解决方案方面存在缺陷,但在复杂技能习得中速度和准确性提升稳健且保持良好:对河内塔谜题进行多阶段训练
Neuropsychologia. 2014 May;57:12-9. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.02.005. Epub 2014 Feb 11.
8
Construct and ecological validity of the Occupational Therapy Adult Perceptual Screening Test (OT-APST).成人职业治疗感知筛查测试(OT-APST)的结构与生态效度。
Scand J Occup Ther. 2006 Mar;13(1):49-61. doi: 10.1080/11038120500363014.
9
Danish translation and adaptation of Loewenstein Occupational Therapy Cognitive Assessment 2nd Edition (LOTCA-II).《洛温斯坦认知作业疗法评定量表第二版》(LOTCA-II)的丹麦语翻译及改编。
Scand J Occup Ther. 2013 Jul;20(4):302-5. doi: 10.3109/11038128.2013.768292. Epub 2013 Apr 22.
10
Cross-cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Simplified Chinese Version of the Knee Outcome Survey Activities of Daily Living Scale.《膝关节功能调查日常生活活动量表》简体中文版的跨文化调适与效度验证
Arthroscopy. 2016 Oct;32(10):2009-2016. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2016.01.068. Epub 2016 Apr 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Usability Evaluation of a Distributed User Interface Application for Visuomotor Organization Assessment.分布式用户界面应用程序用于视动组织评估的可用性评估。
Methods Inf Med. 2020 Dec;59(S 02):e79-e89. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1713086. Epub 2020 Sep 7.