• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

统计学显著性——医学研究中一个被误解的概念。

Statistical significance--a misconstrued notion in medical research.

作者信息

Nurminen M

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Biometry, Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helinski, Finland.

出版信息

Scand J Work Environ Health. 1997 Jun;23(3):232-5.

PMID:9243735
Abstract

The P-value is the significance probability of obtaining a value of the test statistic that is as extreme, in relation to the null hypothesis, as that observed. Medical researchers may, in some situations, disagree on its appropriate use or on its interpretation as a summary measure of consistency with the null hypothesis in a particular data set. More informative statistical measures such as the likelihood ratio and the Bayesian posterior probability have been suggested for drawing inferences from clinical trials and epidemiologic studies. Causal inference is not statistical in nature; rather it strives to provide scientific explanations or criticisms of proposed explanations that would describe the observed data pattern. In this context, it is important to remember that a finding may not be medically important, or a causal hypothesis may even not be true even if a study shows a significant P-value.

摘要

P值是在原假设的前提下,获得与所观察到的检验统计量值同样极端的值的显著概率。在某些情况下,医学研究人员可能在其恰当使用或作为特定数据集中与原假设一致性的汇总度量的解释上存在分歧。有人建议使用更具信息量的统计量,如似然比和贝叶斯后验概率,以便从临床试验和流行病学研究中进行推断。因果推断本质上并非统计学问题;相反,它致力于对所提出的解释提供科学解释或批评,这些解释将描述所观察到的数据模式。在这种背景下,重要的是要记住,即使一项研究显示出显著的P值,一个发现可能在医学上并不重要,或者一个因果假设甚至可能不成立。

相似文献

1
Statistical significance--a misconstrued notion in medical research.统计学显著性——医学研究中一个被误解的概念。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 1997 Jun;23(3):232-5.
2
[Roaming through methodology: XXIX. P].[方法学漫谈:二十九. P]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2001 Jan 13;145(2):74-7.
3
Prior convictions: Bayesian approaches to the analysis and interpretation of clinical megatrials.既往定罪:临床大型试验分析与解读的贝叶斯方法。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004 Jun 2;43(11):1929-39. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.01.035.
4
Calculating the main alternatives to null-hypothesis-significance testing in between-subject experimental designs.计算组间实验设计中零假设显著性检验的主要替代方法。
Psicothema. 2009 Feb;21(1):141-51.
5
[Count on your beliefs. Bayes--not the P value--measures credence].依靠你的信念。贝叶斯方法——而非P值——衡量可信度。
Lakartidningen. 2001 Jul 11;98(28-29):3208-11.
6
Further statistics in dentistry. Part 9: Bayesian statistics.
Br Dent J. 2003 Feb 8;194(3):129-34. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4809892.
7
Living with p values: resurrecting a Bayesian perspective on frequentist statistics.带着 P 值生活:对频率主义统计学的贝叶斯观点的复活。
Epidemiology. 2013 Jan;24(1):62-8. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3182785741.
8
A tutorial on a practical Bayesian alternative to null-hypothesis significance testing.关于实用贝叶斯替代零假设检验的教程。
Behav Res Methods. 2011 Sep;43(3):679-90. doi: 10.3758/s13428-010-0049-5.
9
[Roaming through methodology. XXXVI. Likelihood ratios and Bayes' rule].[方法漫谈。三十六。似然比与贝叶斯法则]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2001 Dec 15;145(50):2421-4.
10
Making meaningful inferences about magnitudes.对数量进行有意义的推断。
Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2006 Mar;1(1):50-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Adherence to nutritional guidelines in pregnancy: evidence from the Growing Up in New Zealand birth cohort study.孕期对营养指南的遵循情况:来自新西兰成长队列研究的证据。
Public Health Nutr. 2014 Sep;17(9):1919-29. doi: 10.1017/S1368980014000482. Epub 2014 Apr 9.