• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

生物战:历史视角

Biological warfare. A historical perspective.

作者信息

Christopher G W, Cieslak T J, Pavlin J A, Eitzen E M

机构信息

Operational Medicine Division, US Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, Fort Detrick, Md. 21702-5011, USA.

出版信息

JAMA. 1997 Aug 6;278(5):412-7.

PMID:9244333
Abstract

The deliberate use of microorganisms and toxins as weapons has been attempted throughout history. Biological warfare has evolved from the crude use of cadavers to contaminate water supplies to the development of specialized munitions for battlefield and covert use. The modern development of biological agents as weapons has paralleled advances in basic and applied microbiology. These include the identification of virulent pathogens suitable for aerosol delivery and industrial-scale fermentation processes to produce large quantities of pathogens and toxins. The history of biological warfare is difficult to assess because of a number of confounding factors. These include difficulties in verification of alleged or attempted biological attacks, the use of allegations of biological attacks for propaganda purposes, the paucity of pertinent microbiological or epidemiologic data, and the incidence of naturally occurring endemic or epidemic diseases during hostilities. Biological warfare has been renounced by 140 nations, primarily for strategic and other pragmatic reasons. International diplomatic efforts, including the 1972 Biological Weapons Convention, have not been entirely effective in preventing the enhancement and proliferation of offensive biological warfare programs. The threats posed by biological weapons are likely to continue into the future.

摘要

历史上曾有人企图故意将微生物和毒素用作武器。生物战已从最初利用尸体污染水源的原始手段,发展到研制用于战场和隐蔽行动的特种弹药。将生物制剂用作武器的现代发展与基础和应用微生物学的进步同步。这些进步包括鉴定出适合通过气溶胶传播的致病病原体,以及开发工业规模的发酵工艺以大量生产病原体和毒素。由于存在诸多混杂因素,生物战的历史难以评估。这些因素包括难以核实所谓的或企图发动的生物袭击、利用生物袭击指控进行宣传、相关微生物学或流行病学数据匮乏,以及敌对行动期间自然发生的地方病或流行病的发病率。140个国家已宣布放弃生物战,主要是出于战略和其他实际原因。包括1972年《生物武器公约》在内的国际外交努力,在防止进攻性生物战计划的强化和扩散方面并未完全取得成效。生物武器构成的威胁在未来可能会持续存在。

相似文献

1
Biological warfare. A historical perspective.生物战:历史视角
JAMA. 1997 Aug 6;278(5):412-7.
2
[The history of biological warfare].[生物战的历史]
Harefuah. 2002 May;141 Spec No:7-12, 124.
3
From asps to allegations: biological warfare in history.从投毒到指控:历史上的生物战
Mil Med. 1995 Aug;160(8):369-73.
4
A short history of biological warfare.生物战简史。
Med Confl Surviv. 2002 Jul-Sep;18(3):271-82. doi: 10.1080/13623690208409635.
5
History of chemical and biological warfare agents.化学和生物战剂的历史。
Toxicology. 2005 Oct 30;214(3):167-81. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2005.06.011.
6
Chemical and biological warfare. Should defenses be researched and deployed?化学和生物战。是否应该研究和部署防御措施?
JAMA. 1989 Aug 4;262(5):644-8.
7
Biological weapons control. Prospects and implications for the future.生物武器控制。未来的前景与影响。
JAMA. 1997 Aug 6;278(5):351-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.278.5.351.
8
Preventing the misuse of microorganisms: the role of the American Society for Microbiology in protecting against biological weapons.
Crit Rev Microbiol. 1998;24(3):273-80. doi: 10.1080/10408419891294226.
9
History of biological warfare and bioterrorism.生物战和生物恐怖主义的历史。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2014 Jun;20(6):497-502. doi: 10.1111/1469-0691.12706.
10
Biological warfare agents.生物战剂
EXS. 2010;100:559-78.

引用本文的文献

1
Treatment of bacterial biothreat agents with a novel purified bioactive lactoferrin affects both growth and biofilm formation.用一种新型纯化生物活性乳铁蛋白治疗细菌生物威胁因子会影响其生长和生物膜形成。
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2025 Jun 17;15:1603689. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2025.1603689. eCollection 2025.
2
Role of radiation emergency medicine: historical view-a perspective on the past, present, and future.辐射应急医学的作用:历史视角——对过去、现在和未来的展望
J Radiat Res. 2024 Dec 16;65(Supplement_1):i24-i31. doi: 10.1093/jrr/rrae037.
3
Jenner's Legacy: How Edward Jenner's Smallpox Vaccine Changed Public Health.
詹纳的遗产:爱德华·詹纳的天花疫苗如何改变公共卫生。
Cureus. 2024 Sep 3;16(9):e68594. doi: 10.7759/cureus.68594. eCollection 2024 Sep.
4
Poxviruses as Agents of Biological Warfare: The Importance of Ensuring Ethical Standards for Research with Viruses.痘病毒作为生物战剂:确保病毒研究符合伦理标准的重要性。
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2024;1451:399-412. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-57165-7_26.
5
Advances in the Development of Small Molecule Antivirals against Equine Encephalitic Viruses.小分子抗马脑炎病毒药物的研究进展。
Viruses. 2023 Feb 1;15(2):413. doi: 10.3390/v15020413.
6
Coloniality and contagion: COVID-19 and the disposability of women of color in feminized labor sectors.殖民性与传染性:新冠疫情与女性化劳动部门中有色人种女性的可被抛弃性
Gend Work Organ. 2022 Oct 19. doi: 10.1111/gwao.12913.
7
Estimation of the Minimal Rift Valley Fever Virus Protective Neutralizing Antibody Titer in Human Volunteers Immunized with MP-12 Vaccine Based on Protection in a Mouse Model of Disease.基于在疾病小鼠模型中的保护作用,估算接种 MP-12 疫苗的人类志愿者中最小裂谷热病毒保护性中和抗体滴度。
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2022 Sep 19;107(5):1091-1098. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.22-0356. Print 2022 Nov 14.
8
Retrospective detection for V-type OPNAs exposure via phosphonylation and disulfide adducts in albumin.通过白蛋白中膦酸化和二硫键加合物对 V 型 OPNAs 暴露的回顾性检测。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jun 29;12(1):10979. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-15198-3.
9
Circulating T Cells Are Not Sufficient for Protective Immunity against Virulent .循环 T 细胞不足以产生针对强毒. 的保护性免疫
J Immunol. 2022 Mar 1;208(5):1180-1188. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.2100915. Epub 2022 Feb 11.
10
Silver Cluster-Porphyrin-Assembled Materials as Advanced Bioprotective Materials for Combating Superbacteria.银簇卟啉组装材料作为对抗超级细菌的先进生物保护材料。
Adv Sci (Weinh). 2022 Jan;9(2):e2103721. doi: 10.1002/advs.202103721. Epub 2021 Nov 10.