Cice G, Di Benedetto A, Tagliamonte E, Ferrara L, Sorice P, Iacono A
Cattedra di Cardiologia, Seconda Università degli Studi, Napoli.
Cardiologia. 1997 Apr;42(4):397-403.
The effects of bisoprolol on transient myocardial ischemia have been compared with those of nifedipine in patients with coronary artery disease in end-stage renal failure maintained on haemodialysis. We also evaluated the tolerability of both drugs. Sixty patients (42 males, 18 females, mean age 52 +/- 4 years) in renal failure maintained on haemodialysis, with coronary artery disease and more than four significant episodes of transient myocardial ischemia (> or = 1 min) during 48-hour Holter monitoring, were included in the study. All cardiovascular drugs were discontinued > or = 6 days before this 48-hour ambulatory ECG monitoring, with the exception of sublingual nitrates allowed for relief of anginal attacks. Patients were then randomized to receive either bisoprolol or nifedipine for 2 weeks. After a 15-day wash-out period, they were crossed over to receive either bisoprolol or nifedipine for other 2 weeks. Statistical analysis was carried out using the Student's t test. A p value < 0.01 was considered significant. Both bisoprolol and nifedipine reduced number and duration of transient ischemic episodes as well as the total ischemic burden. Reductions were statistically significant for both antianginal drugs. Only bisoprolol was effective in silent ischemia (p < 0.001). It also reduced heart rate (p < 0.001), while nifedipine raised it (p < 0.001). Both drugs reduced systolic and diastolic blood pressure. The circadian variations of transient ischemic episodes showed two peaks in the 24 hours. Both peaks were reduced with bisoprolol. Nifedipine brought a clear overall reduction in the number of episodes but the circadian pattern was unchanged. During the study, 10 patients taking bisoprolol and 12 patients taking nifedipine had drug adverse effects. No one of them had to be withdrawn from treatment. In conclusion, bisoprolol seems to be more useful than nifedipine because its effects, in transient ischemic episodes, are greatly superior to those of nifedipine, and because it is effective also in silent ischemia. Both drugs showed a good tolerability in these patients. Bisoprolol, reducing the two daily peaks of ischemic episodes frequency, has a protective role towards mortality due to coronary artery disease.
在接受血液透析的终末期肾衰竭冠心病患者中,比较了比索洛尔与硝苯地平对短暂性心肌缺血的影响。我们还评估了两种药物的耐受性。本研究纳入了60例接受血液透析的肾衰竭患者(42例男性,18例女性,平均年龄52±4岁),这些患者患有冠心病,且在48小时动态心电图监测期间有超过4次显著的短暂性心肌缺血发作(≥1分钟)。在进行这48小时动态心电图监测前≥6天停用所有心血管药物,但允许使用舌下含服硝酸盐缓解心绞痛发作。然后将患者随机分为接受比索洛尔或硝苯地平治疗2周。经过15天的洗脱期后,他们交叉接受比索洛尔或硝苯地平治疗另外2周。采用Student's t检验进行统计分析。p值<0.01被认为具有统计学意义。比索洛尔和硝苯地平均减少了短暂性缺血发作的次数和持续时间以及总的缺血负荷。两种抗心绞痛药物的减少均具有统计学意义。仅比索洛尔对无症状性缺血有效(p<0.001)。它还降低了心率(p<0.001),而硝苯地平使其升高(p<0.001)。两种药物均降低了收缩压和舒张压。短暂性缺血发作的昼夜变化在24小时内显示出两个峰值。比索洛尔使两个峰值均降低。硝苯地平使发作次数明显总体减少,但昼夜模式未改变。在研究期间,10例服用比索洛尔的患者和12例服用硝苯地平的患者出现药物不良反应。他们中没有人必须退出治疗。总之,比索洛尔似乎比硝苯地平更有用,因为其在短暂性缺血发作方面的效果远优于硝苯地平,并且它对无症状性缺血也有效。两种药物在这些患者中均显示出良好的耐受性。比索洛尔减少了缺血发作频率的每日两个峰值,对冠心病导致的死亡率具有保护作用。