Suppr超能文献

降低总缺血负荷的医学治疗:比索洛尔总缺血负荷研究(TIBBS),一项比较比索洛尔和硝苯地平的多中心试验。TIBBS研究人员。

Medical treatment to reduce total ischemic burden: total ischemic burden bisoprolol study (TIBBS), a multicenter trial comparing bisoprolol and nifedipine. The TIBBS Investigators.

作者信息

von Arnim T

机构信息

Ludwig-Maximilians University Munich, Red Cross Hospital, Germany.

出版信息

J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995 Jan;25(1):231-8. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(94)00345-q.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

We compared the effects of bisoprolol on transient myocardial ischemia with those of nifedipine in patients with chronic stable angina.

BACKGROUND

Both beta-adrenergic blocking agents and calcium antagonists reduce transient ischemic episodes, but comparisons of these agents have been made in only a few larger studies.

METHODS

The Total Ischemic Burden Bisoprolol Study (TIBBS) was a randomized double-blind controlled study with two parallel groups; 330 patients from 30 centers in seven European countries with stable angina pectoris, a positive exercise test and more than two transient ischemic episodes during 48 h of Holter monitoring (central evaluation) were included. Of these patients 161 were randomized to receive bisoprolol and 169 to receive nifedipine slow release. There were two treatment phases of 4 weeks each, with 48-h Holter monitoring after each phase. During phase 1, patients received either 10 mg of bisoprolol daily or 2 x 20 mg of nifedipine slow release. During phase 2, they received either 20 mg of bisoprolol daily or 2 x 40 mg of nifedipine slow release.

RESULTS

In phase 1 of the trial, 4 weeks of bisoprolol therapy (10 mg daily) reduced the mean [+/- SD] number of transient ischemic episodes from 8.1 +/- 0.6 to 3.2 +/- 0.4/48 h. Nifedipine (2 x 20 mg) reduced transient ischemic episodes from 8.3 +/- 0.5 to 5.9 +/- 0.4/48 h. Total duration of ischemia was reduced from 99.3 +/- 10.1 to 31.9 +/- 5.5 min/48 h with bisoprolol and from 101 +/- 9.1 to 72.6 +/- 8.1 min/48 h with nifedipine. Reductions were statistically significant for both drugs; the difference between bisoprolol and nifedipine was also significant (p < 0.0001). Bisoprolol reduced the heart rate at onset of episodes by 13.7 +/- 1.4 beats/min from a baseline value of 99.5 +/- 1.2 beats/min (p < 0.001). Heart rate was unchanged with nifedipine. Bisoprolol had significantly higher responder rates than nifedipine. Doubling of the dose in phase 2 of the trial had small additive effects. Only bisoprolol showed a marked circadian effect by reducing the morning peak of transient ischemic episodes (by 68% at peak time, 8:00 to 8:59 AM).

CONCLUSIONS

Both bisoprolol and nifedipine reduced the number and duration of transient ischemic episodes in patients with chronic stable angina. Bisoprolol was significantly more effective than nifedipine in both doses tested and reduced the morning peak of ischemic activity.

摘要

目的

我们比较了比索洛尔与硝苯地平对慢性稳定性心绞痛患者短暂性心肌缺血的影响。

背景

β-肾上腺素能阻滞剂和钙拮抗剂均可减少短暂性缺血发作,但仅在少数较大规模研究中对这些药物进行了比较。

方法

比索洛尔总缺血负荷研究(TIBBS)是一项随机双盲对照研究,分为两个平行组;纳入了来自欧洲七个国家30个中心的330例稳定性心绞痛患者,这些患者运动试验阳性,且在动态心电图监测(中心评估)的48小时内有超过两次短暂性缺血发作。其中161例患者随机接受比索洛尔治疗,169例患者随机接受硝苯地平缓释片治疗。有两个为期4周的治疗阶段,每个阶段后进行48小时动态心电图监测。在第1阶段,患者每日接受10mg比索洛尔或2×20mg硝苯地平缓释片治疗。在第2阶段,他们每日接受20mg比索洛尔或2×40mg硝苯地平缓释片治疗。

结果

在试验的第1阶段,比索洛尔治疗4周(每日10mg)使短暂性缺血发作的平均[±标准差]次数从8.1±0.6次/48小时降至3.2±0.4次/48小时。硝苯地平(2×20mg)使短暂性缺血发作次数从8.3±0.5次/48小时降至5.9±0.4次/48小时。比索洛尔使缺血总时长从99.3±10.1分钟/48小时降至31.9±5.5分钟/48小时,硝苯地平使缺血总时长从101±9.1分钟/48小时降至72.6±8.1分钟/48小时。两种药物的降低幅度均具有统计学意义;比索洛尔与硝苯地平之间的差异也具有显著性(p<0.0001)。比索洛尔使发作开始时的心率从基线值99.5±1.2次/分钟降低了13.7±1.4次/分钟(p<0.001)。硝苯地平治疗后心率未改变。比索洛尔的有效率显著高于硝苯地平。试验第2阶段剂量加倍后效果增加较小。仅比索洛尔通过降低短暂性缺血发作的早晨高峰显示出明显的昼夜效应(高峰时间8:00至8:59AM时降低68%)。

结论

比索洛尔和硝苯地平均可减少慢性稳定性心绞痛患者短暂性缺血发作的次数和时长。在测试的两种剂量下,比索洛尔均显著优于硝苯地平,并降低了缺血活动的早晨高峰。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验