Spurgeon A, Harrington J M, Cooper C L
Institute of Occupational Health, University of Birmingham.
Occup Environ Med. 1997 Jun;54(6):367-75. doi: 10.1136/oem.54.6.367.
The European Community Directive on Working Time, which should have been implemented in member states of the European Community by November 1996, contains several requirements related to working hours, including the right of employees to refuse to work more than 48 hours a week. The United Kingdom government attempted to oppose the Directive, arguing that there is no convincing evidence that hours of work should be limited on health and safety grounds. Much of the research in this area has focused on the problems of shiftworking and previous reviews have therefore tended to emphasise this aspect of working hours. However, there is much less information about the effects of overtime work, which is a central element of the terms of the Directive. This paper reviews the current evidence relating to the potential effects on health and performance of extensions to the normal working day. Several gaps in the literature are identified. Research to date has been restricted to a limited range of health outcomes--namely, mental health and cardiovascular disorders. Other potential effects which are normally associated with stress--for example, gastrointestinal disorders, musculoskeletal disorders, and problems associated with depression of the immune system, have received little attention. Also, there have been few systematic investigations of performance effects, and little consideration of the implications for occupational exposure limits of extensions to the working day. Existing data relate largely to situations where working hours exceed 50 a week and there is a lack of information on hours below this level, which is of direct relevance to the European Community proposal. Finally, it is clear from investigations relating to shiftwork that a range of modifying factors are likely to influence the level and nature of health and performance outcomes. These include the attitudes and motivation of the people concerned, the job requirements, and other aspects of the organisational and cultural climate. It is concluded that there is currently sufficient evidence to raise concerns about the risks to health and safety of long working hours. However, much more work is required to define the level and nature of those risks.
欧洲共同体《工作时间指令》应于1996年11月在欧洲共同体成员国实施,其中包含多项与工作时间相关的要求,包括员工有权拒绝每周工作超过48小时。英国政府试图反对该指令,称没有令人信服的证据表明基于健康和安全理由应限制工作时间。该领域的许多研究都集中在轮班工作的问题上,因此以往的综述往往强调工作时间的这一方面。然而,关于加班工作影响的信息要少得多,而加班工作是该指令条款的核心要素。本文综述了目前有关延长正常工作日对健康和工作表现潜在影响的证据。确定了文献中的几个空白。迄今为止的研究仅限于有限范围的健康结果,即心理健康和心血管疾病。其他通常与压力相关的潜在影响,如胃肠道疾病、肌肉骨骼疾病以及与免疫系统抑制相关的问题,很少受到关注。此外,很少有对工作表现影响的系统调查,也很少考虑延长工作日对职业接触限值的影响。现有数据主要涉及每周工作时间超过50小时的情况,而对于低于这一水平的工作时间缺乏信息,而这与欧洲共同体的提议直接相关。最后,从与轮班工作相关的调查中可以清楚地看出,一系列调节因素可能会影响健康和工作表现结果的程度和性质。这些因素包括相关人员的态度和动机、工作要求以及组织和文化氛围的其他方面。结论是,目前有足够的证据引发对长时间工作对健康和安全风险的担忧。然而,需要做更多的工作来确定这些风险的程度和性质。