Haffner S M
Department of Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio 78284-7873, USA.
Diabetologia. 1997 Jul;40 Suppl 2:S138-40. doi: 10.1007/s001250051430.
Although IGT is clearly associated with increased cardiovascular risk factors, there is currently conflicting data regarding the association of IGT with cardiovascular disease. This is true particularly for stronger study designs, namely prospective studies. This is partly because of the relatively few studies instituted since the WHO IGT criteria were developed [1] but also because there may be uncertainty about whether other risk factors such as blood pressure or dyslipidaemia should be controlled for. If one believes that IGT (that is mildly elevated glucose levels) is responsible for increased cardiovascular risk factors, then multivariate adjustment should not be done. Furthermore, the high variability of the oral glucose tolerance test needs to be taken into account. Lastly, if IGT is a risk factor for CHD, it is not clear that the increased risk of CHD is restricted solely to those IGT subjects who convert to NIDDM.
尽管糖耐量受损(IGT)显然与心血管危险因素增加相关,但目前关于IGT与心血管疾病之间的关联存在相互矛盾的数据。对于更强有力的研究设计,即前瞻性研究而言,情况尤其如此。部分原因是自世界卫生组织(WHO)制定IGT标准以来开展的研究相对较少[1],但也可能是因为对于是否应控制诸如血压或血脂异常等其他危险因素存在不确定性。如果有人认为IGT(即血糖水平轻度升高)是心血管危险因素增加的原因,那么就不应进行多变量调整。此外,需要考虑口服葡萄糖耐量试验的高变异性。最后,如果IGT是冠心病的危险因素,那么尚不清楚冠心病风险增加是否仅局限于那些转变为非胰岛素依赖型糖尿病(NIDDM)的IGT受试者。