MR angiography of the renal artery: comparison of breath-hold two-dimensional phase-contrast cine technique with the phased-array coil and breath-hold two-dimensional time-of-flight technique with the body coil.

Breath-hold 2D phase-contrast (PC) cine MR angiography with a phased-array coil and 2D time-of-flight (TOF) MR angiography were performed in the renal arteries and their findings were compared. Breath-hold 2D thin slice PC and TOF MR angiography were performed in 10 normal volunteers for renal arteries. A PC technique with k-space segmentation was utilized with the phased-array coil. A PC technique provided visualization of the renal artery more distally than a TOF technique (4.8 +/- 0.5 cm vs. 3.7 +/- 0.8 cm). With cardiac triggering, distal renal arteries were well demonstrated in PC MR angiography. On PC images, up- or downward movements of the mid to distal renal arteries with aortic pulsatility were recognized. The quality of the images was better with the PC than with the TOF technique (3.4 vs. 2.7). The mid to distal portions of the renal arteries translationally move with aortic pulsatility. To consistently visualize and evaluate them on MR angiography, cardiac triggering might be required to reduce the effects of pulsatile motions of the renal artery in the use of a phased-array coil.