Stolz S B
J Appl Behav Anal. 1977 Fall;10(3):541-47. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1977.10-541.
This paper reviews the guidelines for behavioral programs published by the National Association of Retarded Children. The review discusses a number of reasons why guidelines should not be enunciated for behavior modification, e.g., the procedures of behavior modification appear to be no more or less subject to abuse and no more or less in need of ethical regulation than intervention procedures derived from any other set of principles and called by other terms. The review recommends alternative methods for protecting the rights of clients who participate in behavioral programs. Specifically, behavioral clinicians, like other therapists, should be governed by the ethics codes of their professions; also, the ethics of all intervention programs should be evaluated in terms of a number of critical issues.
本文回顾了美国弱智儿童协会发布的行为项目指南。该回顾讨论了不应阐明行为修正指南的若干原因,例如,行为修正程序似乎与源自任何其他原则集并被赋予其他名称的干预程序一样,不多不少地容易受到滥用,也不多不少地需要道德规范。该回顾推荐了保护参与行为项目的客户权利的替代方法。具体而言,行为临床医生与其他治疗师一样,应受其专业道德规范的约束;此外,所有干预项目的道德规范都应根据一些关键问题进行评估。