State University of New York at Stony Brook.
J Appl Behav Anal. 1972 Winter;5(4):505-11. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1972.5-505.
Winett and Winkler aptly criticized the "appropriate" behaviors that behavior modifiers have chosen to change. However, after reviewing 14 Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis articles concerning behavior modification in the classroom, they made the sweeping over-generalization that "as currently practised, behavior modification has done very little to change the deplorable state of our schools." Finally, they suggest a free classroom in which learning is accompanied by "singing, laughing, and whistling." A number of studies not mentioned by Winett and Winkler are here presented to illustrate the innovative ways in which behavior modification has been utilized to change the complexion of classrooms from the elementary school to the college level. A strawman model child as purportedly seen by behavior modifiers was built by Winett and Winkler, but this author could not find one instance in the literature where the teacher or behavior modifier desired the behavior thus depicted by the straw-man model child. Furthermore, this author questions the desirability of the "informal" or "free" classroom approach for children with marked social and academic problems. Nonetheless, the general admonition of Winett and Winkler should definitely by taken seriously-namely the behavior modifier should seriously question the behaviors he is being asked to change. Finally, a possible integration of reinforcement principles and some aspects of the informal school are discussed.
温内特和温克勒恰当地批评了行为矫正者选择改变的“适当”行为。然而,在回顾了 14 篇关于课堂行为矫正的《应用行为分析杂志》文章后,他们做出了全面的过度概括,即“就目前的实践而言,行为矫正几乎没有改变我们学校可悲的状况。”最后,他们建议在一个自由的课堂中,学习伴随着“唱歌、欢笑和吹口哨”。本文介绍了一些温内特和温克勒没有提到的研究,这些研究说明了行为矫正已经被创新性地应用于改变从小学到大学的课堂氛围。温内特和温克勒构建了一个据称是行为矫正者所看到的典型模范儿童的 strawman 模型,但作者在文献中没有找到一个例子表明教师或行为矫正者希望孩子表现出 straw-man 模型所描述的行为。此外,作者对有明显社交和学术问题的儿童采用“非正式”或“自由”课堂方法的可取性提出质疑。尽管如此,温内特和温克勒的一般告诫肯定应该引起重视,即行为矫正者应该认真质疑他被要求改变的行为。最后,讨论了强化原则和非正式学校某些方面的可能整合。