Suppr超能文献

速尿大剂量注射与持续输注对重度充血性心力衰竭患者利尿及神经激素激活的影响

Effect of bolus injection versus continuous infusion of furosemide on diuresis and neurohormonal activation in patients with severe congestive heart failure.

作者信息

Aaser E, Gullestad L, Tølløfsrud S, Lundberg J, Hall C, Djøseland O, Kjekshus J, Forfang K

机构信息

Medical Department B, Rikshospitalet University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 1997 Jul;57(4):361-7. doi: 10.3109/00365519709099409.

Abstract

Previous studies have demonstrated that continuous infusion of furosemide results in increased diuresis and natriuresis compared with bolus administration of the drug in patients with severe heart failure. We reasoned that continuous infusion of furosemide caused less activation of neurohumoral mechanisms, since other studies have shown that bolus administration of furosemide may activate this system. We therefore tested the hypothesis that continuous administration of furosemide would increase water and sodium excretion due to less activation of neurohormones. Eight patients with severe heart failure were studied during continuous infusion over 24 h and bolus injections of furosemide twice daily in a randomized cross-over study. Bolus administration of furosemide increased diuresis and natriuresis significantly in the first 4 h after administration compared with continuous administration, but this was later reversed, resulting in similar 24 h total output. The neurohormones measured at baseline were all markedly elevated. Neither regimens of furosemide caused any further significant changes in neurohumoral response except that pro-ANF decreased more during the first 8 h after bolus administration compared to continuous infusion. This study has demonstrated that bolus administration of furosemide in conventional doses is equally effective as continuous intravenous infusion in patients with severe heart failure. This may be due to maximal neurohormonal activation in severe heart failure (NYHA III-IV) which could not be further activated by bolus administration.

摘要

先前的研究表明,与在重度心力衰竭患者中推注速尿相比,持续输注速尿会导致利尿和利钠增加。我们推断,持续输注速尿引起的神经体液机制激活较少,因为其他研究表明,推注速尿可能会激活该系统。因此,我们检验了以下假设:持续给予速尿由于神经激素激活较少,会增加水和钠的排泄。在一项随机交叉研究中,对8例重度心力衰竭患者进行了为期24小时的持续输注以及每日两次的速尿推注研究。与持续给药相比,推注速尿在给药后的前4小时显著增加了利尿和利钠,但随后这种情况发生了逆转,导致24小时总排出量相似。基线时测量的神经激素均显著升高。除了在推注给药后的前8小时与持续输注相比,前心钠素(pro-ANF)下降更多外,两种速尿给药方案均未引起神经体液反应的任何进一步显著变化。这项研究表明,在重度心力衰竭患者中,常规剂量的速尿推注与持续静脉输注同样有效。这可能是由于重度心力衰竭(纽约心脏协会III-IV级)中神经激素的最大激活,而推注给药无法进一步激活这种激活。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验