Suppr超能文献

北爱尔兰的基金持有制如何影响处方模式?一项纵向研究。

How has fundholding in Northern Ireland affected prescribing patterns? A longitudinal study.

作者信息

Rafferty T, Wilson-Davis K, McGavock H

机构信息

Department of Therapeutics and Pharmacology, Queen's University of Belfast.

出版信息

BMJ. 1997 Jul 19;315(7101):166-70. doi: 10.1136/bmj.315.7101.166.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare prescribing patterns in general practices before and after the introduction of fundholding in April 1993 to determine whether fundholding changed prescribing patterns among practices that joined the scheme.

DESIGN

Analysis of prescribing data from the Drug Utilisation Research Unit's database for all practices in Northern Ireland during April 1989 to March 1996.

SETTING

Northern Ireland.

SUBJECTS

23-first wave fundholders, 34 second wave fundholders, 9 third wave fundholders, and 268 non-fundholders.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Prescribing costs per 1000 patients, prescription items per 1000 patients, average cost per item, and rate of generic prescribing.

RESULTS

Prescribing costs and frequency increased in all groups throughout the study. Among the fundholders the rate of increase in costs after fundholding was significantly lower than among non-fundholders. The rate of increase in cost per item fell, coinciding with a significant increase in the rate of generic prescribing. However, with regard to first wave fundholders, their yearly increase in costs in their third year as fundholders (1995-6) was similar to that of the non-fundholders. The earlier practices that joined the scheme seemed to differ in some important respects from those that joined later.

CONCLUSIONS

After fundholders joined the fundholding scheme their patterns of prescribing changed compared with those of non-fundholders: the rate of increase in costs fell and there was a significant rise in the rate of generic prescribing.

摘要

目的

比较1993年4月引入基金持有制前后全科医疗中的处方模式,以确定基金持有制是否改变了加入该计划的医疗机构的处方模式。

设计

分析药物利用研究单位数据库中1989年4月至1996年3月期间北爱尔兰所有医疗机构的处方数据。

地点

北爱尔兰。

研究对象

23家首批基金持有医疗机构、34家第二批基金持有医疗机构、9家第三批基金持有医疗机构和268家非基金持有医疗机构。

主要观察指标

每1000名患者的处方费用、每1000名患者的处方项目数、每项平均费用以及通用名药物处方率。

结果

在整个研究过程中,所有组的处方费用和频率均有所增加。在基金持有医疗机构中,实行基金持有制后的费用增长率明显低于非基金持有医疗机构。每项费用的增长率下降,同时通用名药物处方率显著上升。然而,对于首批基金持有医疗机构来说,其作为基金持有医疗机构的第三年(1995 - 1996年)的年度费用增长与非基金持有医疗机构相似。较早加入该计划的医疗机构在某些重要方面似乎与较晚加入的医疗机构有所不同。

结论

基金持有医疗机构加入基金持有制后,其处方模式与非基金持有医疗机构相比发生了变化:费用增长率下降,通用名药物处方率显著上升。

相似文献

3
Fundholders' prescribing costs: the first five years.基金持有人的处方成本:头五年
BMJ. 1996 Dec 14;313(7071):1531-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7071.1531.
8
GP fundholding and the costs of prescribing: further results.全科医生基金持有制与处方成本:进一步结果
J Public Health Med. 1997 Mar;19(1):18-22. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a024580.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of physician-level drug budgets on prescribing behavior.医生层级药物预算对处方行为的影响。
Eur J Health Econ. 2018 Mar;19(2):213-222. doi: 10.1007/s10198-017-0875-9. Epub 2017 Feb 13.
2
Pharmaceutical policies: effects of financial incentives for prescribers.药品政策:针对开处方者的经济激励措施的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Aug 4;2015(8):CD006731. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006731.pub2.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验