Ido Y, Chang K, LeJeune W, Tilton R G, Monafo W W, Williamson J R
Department of Pathology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110, USA.
Am J Physiol. 1997 Jul;273(1 Pt 1):E174-84. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.1997.273.1.E174.
The most widely used methods to assess nerve blood flow in diabetics rats are hydrogen clearance polarography and laser Doppler flowmetry, techniques requiring surgical exposure of the nerve. In these experiments, we examined the hypothesis that the trauma of surgical exposure introduces an important and hitherto largely unrecognized variable that could account for discordant reports on nerve blood flow changes induced by diabetes. We used the noninvasive (for sciatic nerve) reference sample microsphere method to quantify sciatic nerve blood flow in unexposed va. surgically exposed nerves in rats with streptozotocin-induced diabetes (at different temperatures and after curarization) and in unexposed vs. surgically exposed nerves in galactose-fed rats. Baseline resting blood flow in unexposed nerves in both animal models of diabetes was either normal or increased (but was decreased in diabetic rats given d-tubocurarine). Furthermore, the normal brisk hyperemic nerve blood flow response to the minimal trauma associated with surgical exposure of the nerve was markedly impaired in diabetic and in galactose-fed rats. Normalization of the blood flow response to trauma in galactose-fed rats by an aldose reductase inhibitor suggests that the impairment is linked to increased polyol pathway metabolism. These findings 1) confirm our previous findings that sciatic nerve blood flow in diabetic rats is increased or unchanged in unexposed nerves, while also confirming reports that in surgically exposed nerves blood flow is higher in control than in diabetic rats, and 2) indicate that blood flows in surgically exposed nerves are largely a measure of vascular responses to injury rather than (patho)physiological blood flow in undisturbed nerves.
评估糖尿病大鼠神经血流最常用的方法是氢清除极谱法和激光多普勒血流仪,这些技术需要对神经进行手术暴露。在这些实验中,我们检验了一个假设,即手术暴露造成的创伤引入了一个重要且迄今很大程度上未被认识到的变量,这可能解释了关于糖尿病引起的神经血流变化的不一致报告。我们使用非侵入性(针对坐骨神经)的参考样本微球法,对链脲佐菌素诱导的糖尿病大鼠(在不同温度下和箭毒化后)未暴露与手术暴露的神经中的坐骨神经血流进行定量,以及对半乳糖喂养的大鼠未暴露与手术暴露的神经中的坐骨神经血流进行定量。在这两种糖尿病动物模型中,未暴露神经的基线静息血流要么正常要么增加(但在给予d - 筒箭毒碱的糖尿病大鼠中血流减少)。此外,糖尿病大鼠和半乳糖喂养的大鼠对与神经手术暴露相关的最小创伤的正常快速充血性神经血流反应明显受损。半乳糖喂养的大鼠中醛糖还原酶抑制剂使对创伤的血流反应恢复正常,这表明这种损伤与多元醇途径代谢增加有关。这些发现1)证实了我们之前的发现,即糖尿病大鼠未暴露神经中的坐骨神经血流增加或不变,同时也证实了报告中所说的,在手术暴露的神经中,对照组的血流高于糖尿病大鼠,2)表明手术暴露神经中的血流在很大程度上是血管对损伤的反应的一种度量,而不是未受干扰神经中的(病理)生理血流。