Pourmoghadam K K, Fogler R J, Shaftan G W
Brookdale University Hospital and Medical Center, Department of Surgical Services, Brooklyn, New York 11212-3198, USA.
J Trauma. 1997 Jul;43(1):126-30. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199707000-00029.
Temporization in the management of patients in extremis has gained acceptance in trauma surgery. Resection, without anastomosis, in major visceral injuries followed by delayed reconstruction has been successful.
To evaluate this approach in patients with substantial vascular trauma, we reviewed our experience of five patients with major vascular injuries that were ligated as a temporizing procedure during a 58-month period. If the patient was hypothermic, acidotic, and potentially or actually coagulopathic with significant blood loss, achieving expeditious hemostasis was the primary consideration. After hemodynamic resuscitation, warming, and correction of the coagulation profile, if necessary the patients were returned to the operating room for definitive reconstruction.
All patients survived; only two required subsequent vascular reconstruction.
The prompt control of hemorrhage must be the first objective of treatment in critically injured patients. Ligation of major vessel injury is a therapeutic alternative as part of the "damage control" philosophy.
在创伤外科中,对危重伤员进行临时处理已得到认可。对于主要内脏损伤,采用不进行吻合的切除,随后进行延迟重建已取得成功。
为评估这种方法在严重血管创伤患者中的应用,我们回顾了58个月期间5例主要血管损伤患者的治疗经验,这些患者在临时处理过程中进行了血管结扎。如果患者体温过低、酸中毒且因大量失血存在潜在或实际的凝血功能障碍,迅速止血是首要考虑因素。在进行血流动力学复苏、复温并纠正凝血功能后,如有必要,患者返回手术室进行确定性重建。
所有患者均存活;仅有2例患者随后需要进行血管重建。
迅速控制出血必须是重伤患者治疗的首要目标。主要血管损伤的结扎是“损伤控制”理念的一种治疗选择。