Suppr超能文献

“损伤控制”:一种提高腹部穿透性出血伤患者生存率的方法。

'Damage control': an approach for improved survival in exsanguinating penetrating abdominal injury.

作者信息

Rotondo M F, Schwab C W, McGonigal M D, Phillips G R, Fruchterman T M, Kauder D R, Latenser B A, Angood P A

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.

出版信息

J Trauma. 1993 Sep;35(3):375-82; discussion 382-3.

PMID:8371295
Abstract

Definitive laparotomy (DL) for penetrating abdominal wounding with combined vascular and visceral injury is a difficult surgical challenge. Physiologic derangements such as dilutional coagulopathy, hypothermia, and acidosis often preclude completion of the procedure. "Damage control" (DC), defined as initial control of hemorrhage and contamination followed by intraperitoneal packing and rapid closure, allows for resuscitation to normal physiology in the intensive care unit and subsequent definitive re-exploration. The purpose of the study was to compare the damage control technique with definitive laparotomy. Over a 3 1/2-year period, 46 patients with penetrating abdominal injuries required laparotomy and urgent transfusion of greater than 10 units packed red blood cells for exsanguination. Medical records were retrospectively reviewed for degree and pattern of injury, probability of survival, actual survival, transfusion requirements for the preoperative and postoperative phases, resuscitation and operative times, lowest perioperative temperature, pH, and HCO3. No significant differences were identified between 22 DL and 24 DC patients and actual survival rates were similar (55% DC vs. 58% DL). However, in a subset of 22 patients with major vascular injury and two or more visceral injuries (maximum injury subset), otherwise similar to the overall group, survival was markedly improved in patients treated with damage control (10 of 13, 77%*) vs. DLM (1 of 9, 11%) (Fisher's exact test, * p < 0.02). In preparation for return to the operating room, DC survivors averaged 8.4 units of packed red blood cells transfused and 10.3 units fresh frozen plasma over a mean ICU stay of 31.7 hours. Resolution of coagulopathy (mean prothrombin time/partial thromboplastin time 19.5/70.4 to 13.3/34.9), normalization of acid-base balance (mean pH/HCO3 7.37/20.6 to 7.42/24.2), and core rewarming (mean 33.2 degrees C to 37.7 degrees C) were achieved. All patients had gastrointestinal procedures at reoperation (mean operative time, 4.3 hours). We conclude that damage control is a promising approach for increased survival in exsanguinating patients with major vascular and multiple visceral penetrating abdominal injuries.

摘要

对于伴有血管和内脏联合损伤的穿透性腹部创伤,确定性剖腹手术(DL)是一项具有挑战性的外科难题。诸如稀释性凝血障碍、体温过低和酸中毒等生理紊乱情况常常妨碍手术的完成。“损伤控制”(DC),定义为首先控制出血和污染,随后进行腹腔填塞和快速缝合,这样能在重症监护病房使患者恢复到正常生理状态,随后再进行确定性再次探查。本研究的目的是比较损伤控制技术与确定性剖腹手术。在3年半的时间里,46例穿透性腹部损伤患者需要进行剖腹手术,并因失血过多紧急输注超过10单位的浓缩红细胞。对这些患者的病历进行回顾性分析,内容包括损伤的程度和类型、生存概率、实际生存率、术前和术后阶段的输血需求、复苏和手术时间、围手术期最低体温、pH值和碳酸氢根离子浓度。22例接受确定性剖腹手术的患者和24例接受损伤控制的患者之间未发现显著差异,实际生存率相似(损伤控制组为55%,确定性剖腹手术组为58%)。然而,在22例伴有大血管损伤和两处或更多处内脏损伤的患者亚组(最大损伤亚组)中,该亚组其他情况与总体组相似,接受损伤控制治疗的患者生存率显著提高(13例中有10例,77%*),而接受确定性剖腹手术的患者生存率为(9例中有1例,11%)(Fisher精确检验,*p<0.02)。在准备返回手术室时,损伤控制组的幸存者在平均31.7小时的重症监护病房住院期间平均输注了8.4单位的浓缩红细胞和10.3单位的新鲜冰冻血浆。凝血障碍得到缓解(平均凝血酶原时间/部分凝血活酶时间从19.5/70.4降至13.3/34.9),酸碱平衡恢复正常(平均pH值/碳酸氢根离子浓度从7.37/20.6升至7.42/24.2),核心体温回升(平均从33.2摄氏度升至37.7摄氏度)。所有患者再次手术时均进行了胃肠道手术(平均手术时间为4.3小时)。我们得出结论,对于伴有大血管和多处内脏穿透性腹部损伤且失血的患者,损伤控制是一种有望提高生存率的方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验