Lewis A I, Rosenblatt S S, Tew J M
Department of Neurosurgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, and the Mayfield Clinic, Ohio 45267-0515, USA.
J Neurosurg. 1997 Aug;87(2):198-206. doi: 10.3171/jns.1997.87.2.0198.
The best treatment for deep-seated dural arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) remains controversial. Therapeutic options include transarterial and transvenous embolization, surgical excision of the dural nidus, ligation of draining veins, and stereotactically guided radiation treatment. The authors report on their experience with the application and technique of skull base surgical approaches for deep-seated dural AVMs. Their series includes six patients who were surgically treated for five tentorial dural AVMs and one inferior petrosal sinus dural AVM between 1991 and 1995. Three patients presented with progressive brainstem dysfunction, one had progressive myelopathy, and two suffered subarachnoid hemorrhage. Venous hypertension caused progressive neurological deterioration in four patients and ruptured venous aneurysms caused hemorrhage in two patients. Four of the five tentorial dural AVMs received bilateral arterial supply from the internal carotid arteries and external carotid arteries (ECAs). The dural AVM of the inferior petrosal sinus was fed from both vertebral arteries and ECAs. In this series, all dural AVMs drained into deep cerebral veins. Intra- and postoperative angiographic studies were used to document complete obliteration in each case. After surgery, three patients developed transient, delayed (24-72 hours) neurological worsening. One month postsurgery, all six patients showed improvement from their preoperative neurological function. Surgical resection of these deep-seated dural AVMs was accomplished by eliminating the arterial supply rather than ligating the draining veins to avoid aggravating the underlying venous hypertension. This study demonstrates an important role for skull base surgical approaches in the management of patients with deep-seated dural AVMs that have hemorrhaged, are not obliterated by embolization, and for which stereotactically guided radiation therapy is an unsuitable option.
深部硬脑膜动静脉畸形(AVM)的最佳治疗方法仍存在争议。治疗选择包括经动脉和经静脉栓塞、硬脑膜病灶的手术切除、引流静脉结扎以及立体定向放射治疗。作者报告了他们应用颅底手术方法治疗深部硬脑膜AVM的经验及技术。他们的病例系列包括6例患者,在1991年至1995年间接受了手术治疗,其中5例为天幕硬脑膜AVM,1例为岩下窦硬脑膜AVM。3例患者表现为进行性脑干功能障碍,1例有进行性脊髓病,2例发生蛛网膜下腔出血。静脉高压导致4例患者神经功能进行性恶化,静脉瘤破裂导致2例患者出血。5例天幕硬脑膜AVM中的4例接受来自颈内动脉和颈外动脉(ECA)的双侧动脉供血。岩下窦硬脑膜AVM由椎动脉和ECA供血。在这个病例系列中,所有硬脑膜AVM均引流至大脑深部静脉。术中和术后血管造影研究用于记录每个病例的完全闭塞情况。术后,3例患者出现短暂性、延迟性(24 - 72小时)神经功能恶化。术后1个月,所有6例患者的神经功能均较术前有所改善。这些深部硬脑膜AVM的手术切除是通过消除动脉供血而非结扎引流静脉来完成的,以避免加重潜在的静脉高压。这项研究表明,颅底手术方法在治疗深部硬脑膜AVM患者中具有重要作用,这些患者已出血、不能通过栓塞消除病灶且立体定向放射治疗不合适。