Imhoff A, Buess E, Hodler J, Fellmann J
Clinique Orthopédique Balgrist, Université de Zurich, Suisse.
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 1997;83(3):229-36.
The authors evaluated the use of MR-imaging of the menisci compared to arthroscopy considered as the gold standard by which all noninvasive imaging procedures of the knee have to be measured.
In a prospective study, we evaluated the use of MRI in 50 patients with clinically suspected disorders of the meniscus, followed by an arthroscopic examination by an experienced arthroscopist. MRI studies were performed after clinical evaluation and were interpreted by an experienced radiologist, who had no knowledge of the clinical findings.
The accuracy of the diagnosis from MRI was 78 per cent for the medial meniscus (sensitivity 79 per cent and specificity 78 per cent) and 94 per cent for the lateral meniscus (sensitivity 50 per cent and specificity 98 per cent). The average age of the patients was 34 years, with a range from 3 to 73 years. The imaging studies revealed 9 false positive test and suggested that the meniscus was either degenerated or form in the horizontal plane. In all 9 menisci the abnormal MR imaging signal was limited to the posterior horns. The positive predictive value was 59 per cent and the negative predictive value was 94 per cent representing a moderate level of diagnostic certainty, both in patients who had a positive result and in those who had a negative result. High predictive negative value of MRI indicates that a negative MRI is quite reliable for meniscal lesions.
Problems of MR-imaging are the popliteus tendon sheath and the transverse ligament. This ligament is seen in association with a large branch of the lateral inferior geniculate artery, and may be mistaken for a grade 3 signal intensity in the anterior horn of the lateral meniscus.
A normal MRI allows to eliminate a meniscal lesion and so there is no need for a diagnostic arthroscopy. But with a pathologic MRI there is a risk to establish too often the diagnostic of a meniscal lesion rather then to identify structural modifications as a degeneration.
作者将半月板的磁共振成像(MR成像)与关节镜检查进行了对比评估,关节镜检查被视为金标准,所有膝关节的非侵入性成像程序都需据此进行衡量。
在一项前瞻性研究中,我们对50例临床怀疑有半月板疾病的患者进行了MRI评估,随后由经验丰富的关节镜医生进行关节镜检查。MRI检查在临床评估后进行,由一位不了解临床检查结果的经验丰富的放射科医生解读。
内侧半月板MRI诊断的准确率为78%(敏感性79%,特异性78%),外侧半月板为94%(敏感性50%,特异性98%)。患者的平均年龄为34岁,范围为3至73岁。影像学检查发现9例假阳性结果,提示半月板要么退变,要么呈水平位形态。在所有9个半月板中,异常的MR成像信号均局限于后角。阳性预测值为59%,阴性预测值为94%,这在结果为阳性和阴性的患者中均代表中等程度的诊断确定性。MRI较高的阴性预测值表明,MRI阴性对于半月板损伤相当可靠。
MR成像的问题在于腘肌腱鞘和横韧带。该韧带与膝下外侧动脉的一个大分支有关,可能会被误认为外侧半月板前角的3级信号强度。
正常的MRI可排除半月板损伤,因此无需进行诊断性关节镜检查。但对于病理性MRI,存在过度诊断半月板损伤而非识别退变等结构改变的风险。