• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Comparison of registered nurses' and nursing assistants' choices of intervention for aggressive behaviors.

作者信息

Haber L C, Fagan-Pryor E C, Allen M

机构信息

Department of Nursing, VA Northern Indiana Health Care System, Marion 46953-4589, USA.

出版信息

Issues Ment Health Nurs. 1997 Mar-Apr;18(2):113-24. doi: 10.3109/01612849709010328.

DOI:10.3109/01612849709010328
PMID:9256691
Abstract

This article extends the work conducted by Fagan-Pryor, Femea, and Haber (1994), in which factor analyses were used to examine the congruence between aggressive behavior and type of intervention warranted (verbal, chemical, or physical), as rated by nursing personnel. The purpose of this study was to determine if 88 registered nurses (RNs) and 84 nursing assistants (NAs) would choose similar interventions for 84 aggressive behaviors. The three scales used (labeled Precursor, Defensive, and Acting Out) obtained Cronbach alpha internal consistency reliabilities ranging from .79 to .96. Analyses of variance indicated that RNs and NAs agreed on a set of precursor behaviors for which they would use therapeutic verbal intervention. RN and NA responses differed significantly only in prescribing the use of physical intervention for behaviors on the Defensive and Acting Out scales. In both situations, RNs selected fewer behaviors that required physical intervention than did NAs. Implications for clinical practice are presented.

摘要

相似文献

1
Comparison of registered nurses' and nursing assistants' choices of intervention for aggressive behaviors.
Issues Ment Health Nurs. 1997 Mar-Apr;18(2):113-24. doi: 10.3109/01612849709010328.
2
An exploratory account of registered nurses' experience of patient aggression in both mental health and general nursing settings.对注册护士在心理健康和普通护理环境中遭遇患者攻击的经历的探索性描述。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 1999 Apr;6(2):107-14. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2850.1999.620107.x.
3
Understanding RN and unlicensed assistive personnel working relationships in designing care delivery strategies.在设计护理提供策略时理解注册护士与无执照辅助人员的工作关系。
J Nurs Adm. 2004 Jan;34(1):19-25. doi: 10.1097/00005110-200401000-00006.
4
Perceptions of registered nurses working with assistive personnel in the United Kingdom and the United States.英国和美国注册护士与辅助人员合作的认知情况。
Int J Nurs Pract. 2000 Feb;6(1):46-57. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-172x.2000.00206.x.
5
Mouth care in nursing homes: knowledge, beliefs, and practices of nursing assistants.养老院中的口腔护理:护理助理的知识、观念与实践
Geriatr Nurs. 2009 Mar-Apr;30(2):99-107. doi: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2008.06.010. Epub 2008 Nov 17.
6
Differences between Registered Nurses and nurse assistants around missed nursing care-An observational, comparative study.注册护士和护士助理在遗漏护理方面的差异——一项观察性、比较研究。
Scand J Caring Sci. 2023 Dec;37(4):1028-1037. doi: 10.1111/scs.13175. Epub 2023 Apr 28.
7
Nurses information-processing patterns: impact on change and innovation.护士的信息处理模式:对变革与创新的影响
Nurs Adm Q. 2006 Oct-Dec;30(4):330-9. doi: 10.1097/00006216-200610000-00005.
8
Congruence between aggressive behavior and type of intervention as rated by nursing personnel.护理人员评定的攻击性行为与干预类型之间的一致性。
Issues Ment Health Nurs. 1994 Mar-Apr;15(2):187-99. doi: 10.3109/01612849409006912.
9
Nursing care of cognitively impaired, institutionalized elderly.
J Gerontol Nurs. 1991 Apr;17(4):37-43. doi: 10.3928/0098-9134-19910401-08.
10
A comparison of the verbal interactions of qualified nurses and nursing auxiliaries in primary, team and functional nursing wards.
Int J Nurs Stud. 1994 Jun;31(3):231-44. doi: 10.1016/0020-7489(94)90049-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Nursing Ethical Decision Making on Adult Physical Restraint: A Scoping Review.成人身体约束的护理伦理决策:范围综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Jan 9;21(1):75. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21010075.