Suppr超能文献

大鼠间隙检测的信号检测理论分析。

A signal detection theory analysis of gap detection in the rat.

作者信息

Leitner D S, Carmody D P, Girten E M

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Saint Joseph's University, Philadelphia, PA 19131-1395, USA.

出版信息

Percept Psychophys. 1997 Jul;59(5):774-82. doi: 10.3758/bf03206023.

Abstract

An innocuous sensory event (a prestimulus) briefly preceding a startle-eliciting stimulus (SES) reduces the amplitude of the elicited reflex. This study used signal detection theory (SDT) techniques to quantify the effects of gaps (pauses in otherwise continuous noise) on the rat's acoustic startle reflex. Sixteen rats were given four identical test sessions consisting of the randomized presentation of 150 trials of the SES alone and 150 trials of a gap-and-SES combination. Gap duration (1, 2, 4, and 8 msec) varied between sessions. Data analyses based on amplitude, difference scores, percentage scores, and SDT techniques identified similar patterns. The three longest gaps, but not the shortest, were reliably detected, and differences among these three were identified with percentage and SDT analyses. Analyses of amplitude changes over test sessions yielded different patterns for each measure. The results demonstrate that an SDT analysis is a sensitive index of prestimulus effects.

摘要

在引发惊吓的刺激(SES)之前短暂出现的无害感觉事件(预刺激)会降低所引发反射的幅度。本研究使用信号检测理论(SDT)技术来量化间隙(在原本连续的噪声中的停顿)对大鼠听觉惊吓反射的影响。16只大鼠接受了四个相同的测试环节,每个环节包含150次单独的SES试验和150次间隙与SES组合试验的随机呈现。间隙持续时间(1、2、4和8毫秒)在各环节之间有所不同。基于幅度、差异分数、百分比分数和SDT技术的数据分析确定了相似的模式。三个最长的间隙(而非最短的间隙)能够被可靠地检测到,并且通过百分比和SDT分析确定了这三个间隙之间的差异。对测试环节中幅度变化的分析针对每种测量方法产生了不同的模式。结果表明,SDT分析是预刺激效应的一个敏感指标。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验