Jentschura D, Winkler M, Strohmeier N, Rumstadt B, Hagmüller E
Department of Surgery, Faculty for Clinical Medicine Mannheim, University of Heidelberg.
Hepatogastroenterology. 1997 Jul-Aug;44(16):1137-42.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Quality-of-Life has become an increasingly important factor for long term survivors after surgery for gastric cancer. Quality-of Life also includes social and psychological aspects. Many gastric carcinomas are located in the distal two thirds of the stomach. In these cases, a subtotal gastric resection may be adequate if a proximal safety margin of 5 cm in intestinal type tumors according to Laurén and 10 cm in diffuse type cancers respectively can be achieved. On the other hand total gastrectomy "de principe" has been advocated for all gastric malignancies because of high local recurrence rates after subtotal resection. The aim of the present study was to assess the Quality-of-Life in long term survivors after resection for gastric cancer comparing subtotal gastric resection with total gastrectomy.
One hundred ninety-five patients were examined with the Gastrointestinal Quality-of-Life-Index (GLQI). Hard clinical data such as postoperative weight loss, frequency of daily meals and bowel emptying were evaluated. One hundred five patients were submitted for total gastrectomy and in 90 patients a subtotal gastric resection was performed. None of the patients had clinical, radiological or endoscopic evidence of recurrence.
After subtotal gastric resection, patients achieved statistically significant better scores concerning disease/therapy-related symptoms, physical functions resulting in a better overall score (p < 0.02). Following subtotal resection, patients had a significantly lower weight loss compared to patients after total gastrectomy (p < 0.02), a smaller number of daily meals (p < 0.001) and a lower frequency of bowel emptying/day (p = 0.031). There was no statistically significant difference in emotional status or social activities showing a similar acceptance of disease and therapy in both groups.
In those cases where an adequate proximal safety margin can be achieved by a subtotal gastric resection, this procedure is preferable to a total gastrectomy. However preservation of the gastric stump should never be allowed to compromise oncological radicality.
背景/目的:生活质量已成为胃癌手术后长期存活者日益重要的因素。生活质量还包括社会和心理方面。许多胃癌位于胃的远端三分之二。在这些情况下,如果根据劳伦分类,肠型肿瘤近端安全切缘达到5厘米,弥漫型癌达到10厘米,次全胃切除术可能就足够了。另一方面,由于次全切除术后局部复发率高,一直有人主张对所有胃恶性肿瘤“原则上”行全胃切除术。本研究的目的是比较次全胃切除术和全胃切除术,评估胃癌切除术后长期存活者的生活质量。
用胃肠道生活质量指数(GLQI)对195例患者进行检查。评估术后体重减轻、每日进餐次数和肠道排空等硬临床数据。105例患者接受了全胃切除术,90例患者进行了次全胃切除术。所有患者均无临床、放射学或内镜检查复发证据。
次全胃切除术后,患者在疾病/治疗相关症状、身体功能方面的得分在统计学上显著更高,总体得分更好(p<0.02)。次全切除术后,患者体重减轻明显低于全胃切除术后患者(p<0.02),每日进餐次数更少(p<0.001),每天肠道排空频率更低(p=0.031)。两组在情绪状态或社会活动方面无统计学显著差异,对疾病和治疗的接受程度相似。
在次全胃切除术能够获得足够近端安全切缘的情况下,该手术比全胃切除术更可取。然而,绝不能因保留胃残端而影响肿瘤根治性。