• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Plateletapheresis with a next generation blood cell separator.

作者信息

Burgstaler E A, Pineda A A, Potter B M, Brown R

机构信息

Division of Transfusion Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Apher. 1997;12(2):55-62. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1098-1101(1997)12:2<55::aid-jca1>3.0.co;2-8.

DOI:10.1002/(sici)1098-1101(1997)12:2<55::aid-jca1>3.0.co;2-8
PMID:9263111
Abstract

Procedure time has been identified as the-most important element in apheresis platelet donor retention. Fenwal has developed a next generation apheresis system, the Amicus, with the intent of efficiently producing high platelet yields with low WBC content in much shorter processing times than currently available. This report describes the Amicus and presents results of a clinical trial of an Amicus prototype and a comparison to Fenwal CS 3000+. Thirty Amicus double-needle plateletapheresis procedures were evaluated. Average processing time was 61 +/- 16 min with 63% of the processing times < or = 60 min. The average preplatelet count was 246 +/- 46 x 10(3)/microliter, platelet yield 4.4 +/- 1.2 x 10(11) plt, collection efficiency 73 +/- 14%, platelet collection rate 0.075 +/- 0.016 plt x 10(11)/min and citrate toxicity incidence 3%. A comparison of double-needle procedures, 20 Amicus and 20 CS 3000+, showed that Amicus had significantly shorter (P < .05) processing times (64 +/- 17 vs. 86 +/- 10 min) and higher (P < .05) platelet collection rates (0.070 +/- 0.017 vs. 0.054 +/- 0.018 plt x 10(11)/min) but comparable (P < .05) platelet yields (4.4 +/- 1.4 vs. 4.7 +/- 1.0 x 10(11) plt). Comparison of 13 single and 13 double-needle Amicus procedures showed comparable (P < .05) processing times (71 +/- 13 vs. 65 +/- 18 min), platelet yields (4.7 +/- 1.0 vs. 4.6 +/- 1.5 x 10(11) plt), collection efficiency (74 +/- 7 vs 74 +/- 17%), and platelet collection rates (0.068 +/- 0.020 vs 0.072 +/- 0.018 plt x 10(11)/min). Using normal probability plots of WBC content at 95% confidence level. Amicus can provide products with < 5.0 x 10(6)WBC or < 1.0 x 10(6) WBC in 99.7% or 92.7% of collections, respectively, compared with 69.0% or 44.0%, respectively, for CS 3000+. We found Amicus was able to provide equivalent quantities of platelets with less WBC content in significantly shorter processing times than CS3000+ as well as shown encouraging results for single-needle procedures.

摘要

相似文献

1
Plateletapheresis with a next generation blood cell separator.
J Clin Apher. 1997;12(2):55-62. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1098-1101(1997)12:2<55::aid-jca1>3.0.co;2-8.
2
Comparison of double dose plateletpheresis on the Fenwal Amicus, Fresenius COM.TEC and Trima Accel cell separators.双剂量血小板单采在芬瓦尔德阿米库斯、费森尤斯COM.TEC和特里马加速型血细胞分离机上的比较。
Transfus Apher Sci. 2014 Oct;51(2):193-6. doi: 10.1016/j.transci.2014.08.022. Epub 2014 Sep 2.
3
Plateletapheresis: comparison of processing times, platelet yields, and white blood cell content with several commonly used systems.
J Clin Apher. 1997;12(4):170-8. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1098-1101(1997)12:4<170::aid-jca3>3.0.co;2-7.
4
Comparison of Plateletpheresis on the Fenwal Amicus and Fresenius Com.Tec Cell Separators.费恩沃尔阿米库斯血细胞分离机和费森尤斯Com.Tec细胞分离机上血小板单采术的比较
Transfus Med Hemother. 2008;35(5):368-373. doi: 10.1159/000151351. Epub 2008 Sep 16.
5
Evaluation of the Amicus Separator in the collection of apheresis platelets.
Transfusion. 1998 Sep;38(9):848-54. doi: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.1998.38998409005.x.
6
Comparison of plateletpheresis on the Fenwal Amicus, Fresenius COM.TEC, and Trima Accel Cell separators.芬华艾美仕血细胞分离机、费森尤斯COM.TEC血细胞分离机和特里马加速型血细胞分离机的血小板单采术比较。
J Clin Apher. 2015 Jun;30(3):171-5. doi: 10.1002/jca.21358. Epub 2014 Sep 17.
7
Prospective comparison of plateletapheresis using four apheresis systems on the same donors.
J Clin Apher. 1999;14(4):163-70. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1098-1101(1999)14:4<163::aid-jca2>3.0.co;2-3.
8
Prospective, paired crossover comparison of multiple, single-needle plateletpheresis procedures with the Amicus and Trima Accel cell separators.使用Amicus和Trima Accel血细胞分离机对多种单针血小板采集程序进行前瞻性配对交叉比较。
Transfusion. 2006 Nov;46(11):2004-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2006.01009.x.
9
Paired comparison of Gambro Trima Accel versus Baxter Amicus single-needle plateletpheresis.金宝Trima Accel与百特Amicus单针血小板分离术的配对比较。
Transfusion. 2004 Nov;44(11):1612-20. doi: 10.1111/j.0041-1132.2004.04129.x.
10
Comparison of the in vitro storage properties of Amicus apheresis platelets collected using single- and double-needle procedures from the same donors.比较同一供者采用单针和双针程序采集的 Amicus 机采血小板的体外储存特性。
Transfusion. 2012 Mar;52(3):524-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2011.03320.x. Epub 2011 Aug 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative assessment of single-donor plateletpheresis by Haemonetics MCS plus and Trima Accel.采用Haemonetics MCS plus和Trima Accel进行单供体血小板采集的比较评估。
Asian J Transfus Sci. 2020 Jan-Jun;14(1):23-27. doi: 10.4103/ajts.AJTS_138_17. Epub 2020 Jul 24.