Yockey C, Murphy S, Eggers L, Garratty G, Dingle A, Helms C, Moroff G
American Red Cross Biomedical Services, National Headquarters, Arlington, Virginia, USA.
Transfusion. 1998 Sep;38(9):848-54. doi: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.1998.38998409005.x.
A new apheresis instrument, the Amicus Separator with software versions 2.13 and 2.34, was evaluated for component yields, collection efficiency, and incidence of donor and transfusion recipient reactions. The Amicus was also compared to the Spectra Leukocyte Reduction System (LRS) with version 5 software.
Single and double apheresis platelets (APs) were collected at two locations. The targeted platelet yields were 4.0 x 10(11) for single APs and 6.8 x 10(11) for double APs. One location used a double-needle procedure, and the other used a single-needle procedure. Along with 28 of the Amicus procedures (14 at each of two locations), the same donors underwent single or double AP collections on the Spectra LRS. APs were tested for platelet yields and residual white cells. APs were transfused in three hospitals. Donor and transfusion recipient reactions and technical problems were documented.
The Amicus Separator efficiently collected single APs (n = 59) and double APs (n = 62) with mean platelet yields of 4.2 x 10(11) and 6.5 x 10(11), respectively. When inlet line alarms occurred in single-needle procedures, platelet yields were lower and collection times were longer. All APs were white cell-reduced below 5.0 x 10(6), and all but one AP were white cell-reduced below 1.0 x 10(6) without filtration. Component yields from the paired Amicus and Spectra LRS procedures were comparable. Collection times (excluding reinfusion/rinseback) were 20 to 23 minutes faster on the Amicus Separator. No serious donor or transfusion recipient reactions occurred.
The Amicus Separator provided satisfactory platelet yields and collection efficiency, with shorter collection times than did the Spectra LRS, and it white cell-reduced components without filtration.
