Tailor A, Jurkovic D, Bourne T H, Collins W P, Campbell S
Academic Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, King's College School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, UK.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Jul;10(1):41-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.1997.10010041.x.
The aim of the study was to assign a probability of malignancy for any patient with an adnexal tumor by the application of multivariate logistic regression analysis to variables recorded at the time of pelvic sonography. Sixty-seven women with known adnexal masses were examined using transvaginal B-mode and color Doppler imaging. For each patient the variables included: (1) age, (2) maximum tumor diameter, (3) tumor volume, (4) unilocularity (presence (0) or absence(1)), (5) papillary projections (presence (1) or absence (0)), (6) random echogenicity (presence (1) or absence (0)), (7) highest peak systolic velocity (PSV), (8) time-averaged maximum velocity (TAMXV), (9) pulsatility index (PI) and (10) resistance index (RI). The TAMXV, PI and RI were those associated with the highest PSV. These ten independent variables and the final histological diagnosis for each patient (the dependent variable) were used for the regression analysis. Approximately 75% of the entire dataset was randomly selected for generating the regression model. The remaining 25% was used as the testing set for cross-validation of the model. In the entire dataset there were 52 women with benign, three with borderline and 12 with invasive ovarian tumors. Regression analysis on the ten variables resulted in the retention of only 'age', 'papillary projection score' and 'TAMXV' as significantly contributing to predicting the presence or absence of malignancy. The probability of malignancy for any patient was given by solving the equation: Probability = 1/(1 + e-z) where e is the base value for natural logarithms and z = (0.1273 x Age) + (0.2794 x TAMXV) + (4.4136 x Papillary projections score) - 14.2046. Cross-validation of the model on the test set of data gave a 100% sensitivity and specificity. However, for the entire dataset the best sensitivity and specificity were 93.3 and 90.4%, respectively, at a cut-off value of 25% probability of malignancy. In conclusion, multivariate logistic regression analysis enables the calculation of probability of malignancy for any patient with a known adnexal mass. The accuracy of this prediction appears to be better than that of morphological or Doppler criteria when the latter are used independently. The value of this model needs to be tested prospectively.
本研究的目的是通过对盆腔超声检查时记录的变量进行多因素逻辑回归分析,来确定任何附件肿瘤患者的恶性肿瘤概率。对67例已知附件包块的女性进行经阴道B超和彩色多普勒成像检查。对于每位患者,记录的变量包括:(1)年龄,(2)肿瘤最大直径,(3)肿瘤体积,(4)单房性(存在(0)或不存在(1)),(5)乳头状突起(存在(1)或不存在(0)),(6)随机回声(存在(1)或不存在(0)),(7)最高收缩期峰值流速(PSV),(8)时间平均最大流速(TAMXV),(9)搏动指数(PI)和(10)阻力指数(RI)。TAMXV、PI和RI是与最高PSV相关的指标。这十个自变量以及每位患者的最终组织学诊断(因变量)用于回归分析。大约75%的整个数据集被随机选择用于生成回归模型。其余25%用作模型交叉验证的测试集。在整个数据集中,有52例女性患有良性肿瘤,3例为交界性肿瘤,12例为侵袭性卵巢肿瘤。对这十个变量进行回归分析后,仅保留“年龄”、“乳头状突起评分”和“TAMXV”作为预测恶性肿瘤存在与否的显著因素。任何患者的恶性肿瘤概率可通过求解以下方程得出:概率 = 1 / (1 + e^-z),其中e是自然对数的底数,z = (0.1273×年龄) + (0.2794×TAMXV) + (4.4136×乳头状突起评分) - 14.2046。在测试数据集上对模型进行交叉验证,得到的敏感性和特异性均为100%。然而,对于整个数据集,在恶性肿瘤概率截断值为25%时,最佳敏感性和特异性分别为93.3%和90.4%。总之,多因素逻辑回归分析能够计算任何已知附件包块患者的恶性肿瘤概率。当单独使用形态学或多普勒标准时,该预测的准确性似乎优于它们。此模型的价值需要进行前瞻性测试。