Loria R M
Virginia Commonwealth University, Medical College of Virginia, Richmond 23298-0678, USA.
Psychoneuroendocrinology. 1997;22 Suppl 1:S103-8. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4530(97)00005-x.
The anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive functions of corticosteroids have been well established and characterized. In contrast, a different group of native steroids, which include dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) and two of its metabolites, androstenediol (5-androstene-3 beta-17 beta-diol, AED) and androstenetriol (5-androstene-3 beta-7 beta-17 beta-triol, beta AET), function in vivo to up-regulate host immune response against infections and counteract stress-induced immunosuppression. Indeed, DHEA and particularly, AED and beta AET, have been shown to protect mice from viral, bacterial, and parasitic infections. In vivo, these three hormones are in opposition to the widely demonstrated immunosuppressive action of glucocorticoids, suggesting a possible new immune regulation mechanism. The individual activity in vitro of each of these steroids, i.e. DHEA, AED, and beta AET, on a mitogen-induced mixed splenocyte proliferation assay were determined. The results showed that DHEA suppressed the proliferation of cultures activated with concanavalin A (ConA) or lipopolysaccharide (LPS) in a dose-dependent manner. AED had little influence on the activation response. However, beta AET potentiated the response to both mitogens significantly above control. The regulation of the cytokine secretion, of both interleukin-2 (IL-2) and interleukin-3 (IL-3), from ConA-activated lymphocytes was affected in the same manner. These functions were depressed by DHEA, unaffected by AED, and potently increased by beta AET. Moreover, the classic immunosuppressive effects of hydrocortisone on ConA-induced lymphocyte proliferation, as well as on IL-2 and IL-3 production, were unaffected by being co-cultured with DHEA and only minimally counteracted by AED at high doses. In contrast, co-culturing with beta AET significantly counteracted the immunosuppressive effects of hydrocortisone on lymphocyte proliferation and cytokine production. These data show that in-vivo, DHEA, AED, and beta AET may have some similar functions, while in vitro, their effects are dramatically different from one another. Only beta AET could markedly potentiate the cellular response by increasing lymphocyte activation and counteracting the immnosuppressive activity of hydrocortisone on lymphocyte proliferation and cytokine production.
皮质类固醇的抗炎和免疫抑制功能已得到充分证实和描述。相比之下,另一组天然类固醇,包括脱氢表雄酮(DHEA)及其两种代谢产物,雄烯二醇(5-雄烯-3β-17β-二醇,AED)和雄烯三醇(5-雄烯-3β-7β-17β-三醇,βAET),在体内发挥作用,上调宿主针对感染的免疫反应并抵消应激诱导的免疫抑制。事实上,DHEA,尤其是AED和βAET,已被证明能保护小鼠免受病毒、细菌和寄生虫感染。在体内,这三种激素与糖皮质激素广泛表现出的免疫抑制作用相反,提示可能存在一种新的免疫调节机制。测定了这些类固醇(即DHEA、AED和βAET)各自在丝裂原诱导的混合脾细胞增殖试验中的体外活性。结果表明,DHEA以剂量依赖的方式抑制用刀豆蛋白A(ConA)或脂多糖(LPS)激活的培养物的增殖。AED对激活反应影响很小。然而,βAET显著增强了对两种丝裂原的反应,明显高于对照组。ConA激活的淋巴细胞分泌白细胞介素-2(IL-2)和白细胞介素-3(IL-3)这两种细胞因子的调节也受到同样的影响。这些功能被DHEA抑制,不受AED影响,而被βAET强烈增强。此外,氢化可的松对ConA诱导的淋巴细胞增殖以及对IL-2和IL-3产生的经典免疫抑制作用,与DHEA共培养时不受影响,高剂量的AED仅能轻微抵消。相比之下,与βAET共培养显著抵消了氢化可的松对淋巴细胞增殖和细胞因子产生的免疫抑制作用。这些数据表明,在体内,DHEA、AED和βAET可能具有一些相似的功能,而在体外,它们的作用彼此显著不同。只有βAET能通过增加淋巴细胞激活并抵消氢化可的松对淋巴细胞增殖和细胞因子产生的免疫抑制活性,显著增强细胞反应。