Suppr超能文献

脱氢表雄酮及其代谢产物对免疫反应的调节

Regulation of the immune response by dehydroepiandrosterone and its metabolites.

作者信息

Loria R M, Padgett D A, Huynh P N

机构信息

Department of Microbiology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Medical College of Virginia, Richmond 23298-09678, USA.

出版信息

J Endocrinol. 1996 Sep;150 Suppl:S209-20.

PMID:8943803
Abstract

Dehydroepiandrosterone (5-androsten-3 beta-ol-17-one, DHEA) has been shown to protect mice from a variety of lethal infections. This includes, but is not limited to, infection with viruses (herpes virus type 2, coxsackie virus B4 (CB4)), bacteria (Enterococcus faecalis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa), and a parasite (Cryptosporidium parvum). We have previously reported that androstenediol (5-androstene-3 beta, 17 beta-diol, AED), derived from DHEA, is at least 100 x more effective in up-regulating systemic resistance against CB4 infection than its precursor. Furthermore, androstenetriol (5-androstene-3 beta,7 beta, 17 beta-triol, AET) which is formed by 7 beta hydroxylation of AED, was more effective against CB4 infection than its precursor, AED. Neither steroid, however, has shown any significant direct antiviral effects. The in vitro influences of DHEA, AED and AET on a mitogen-induced mixed splenocyte proliferation assay were determined. The results showed that DHEA suppressed the proliferation of concanavalin A (ConA)- or lipopolysaccharide-activated cultures in a dose-dependent manner. AED had little influence on the activation response. However, AET potentiated the response to both mitogens significantly above the control level. The regulation of interleukin (IL)-2 and IL-3 secretion from ConA-activated lymphocytes was analogous to these observations. These functions were depressed by DHEA, unaffected by AED, and potently increased by AET. Moreover, the classic immunosuppressive effects of hydrocortisone on ConA-induced lymphocyte proliferation, as well as IL-2 and IL-3 production, were unaffected by co-culture with DHEA and only minimally counteracted by AED. In contrast. AET significantly counteracted the effect of hydrocortisone when co-cultured together. These data show that while DHEA, AED and AET each function in a similar manner in vivo, in vitro their effects are dramatically different from one another with only AET potentiating the cellular response by increasing lymphocyte activation and counteracting the immunosuppressive activity of hydrocortisone.

摘要

脱氢表雄酮(5-雄烯-3β-醇-17-酮,DHEA)已被证明能保护小鼠免受多种致命感染。这包括但不限于感染病毒(2型疱疹病毒、柯萨奇病毒B4(CB4))、细菌(粪肠球菌、铜绿假单胞菌)和寄生虫(微小隐孢子虫)。我们之前报道过,由DHEA衍生而来的雄烯二醇(5-雄烯-3β,17β-二醇,AED)在上调对CB4感染的全身抵抗力方面比其前体至少有效100倍。此外,由AED的7β羟基化形成的雄烯三醇(5-雄烯-3β,7β,17β-三醇,AET)对CB4感染的效果比其前体AED更有效。然而,这两种类固醇都未显示出任何显著的直接抗病毒作用。测定了DHEA、AED和AET对丝裂原诱导的混合脾细胞增殖试验的体外影响。结果表明,DHEA以剂量依赖的方式抑制刀豆蛋白A(ConA)或脂多糖激活的培养物的增殖。AED对激活反应影响很小。然而,AET使对两种丝裂原的反应显著增强至高于对照水平。来自ConA激活的淋巴细胞的白细胞介素(IL)-2和IL-3分泌的调节与这些观察结果相似。这些功能被DHEA抑制,不受AED影响,并被AET有效增强。此外,氢化可的松对ConA诱导的淋巴细胞增殖以及IL-2和IL-3产生的经典免疫抑制作用,在与DHEA共培养时不受影响,仅被AED轻微抵消。相比之下,AET与氢化可的松共培养时能显著抵消其作用。这些数据表明,虽然DHEA、AED和AET在体内的作用方式相似,但在体外它们的作用却有很大差异,只有AET通过增加淋巴细胞激活来增强细胞反应并抵消氢化可的松的免疫抑制活性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验