• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Medmont M600自动视野计检测注视威胁的能力。

The ability of Medmont M600 automated perimetry to detect threats to fixation.

作者信息

Zhang L, Drance S M, Douglas G R

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.

出版信息

J Glaucoma. 1997 Aug;6(4):259-62.

PMID:9264306
Abstract

PURPOSE

The authors studied the sensitivity and specificity of the Medmont M600 central 10 degrees program (Medmont PTY Ltd., Camberwell, Victoria, Australia) in identifying paracentral threats to fixation mapped on the Humphrey program 10-2 (Humphrey Inst. Inc., San Leandro, CA, U.S.A.).

METHODS

Humphrey automated threshold perimetry (program 10-2) and Medmont M600 automated threshold perimetry (central 10 degrees program) were performed on 62 eyes of 62 patients with glaucoma, and their paracentral point defects on the field were investigated. The sensitivity and specificity of Medmont central 10 degrees program were analyzed.

RESULTS

The sensitivity and specificity of Medmont M600 central 10 degrees field was 78% and 81% within 1 degree, and 95% and 83% within 3 degrees in detecting the field defects on the Humphrey program 10-2. The Medmont M600 central 10 degrees threshold visual field test took 36% of the testing time required for the Humphrey threshold 10-2 visual field examination.

CONCLUSION

The Medmont perimeter seems to be efficient in its performance of central threshold testing and significantly cuts down the test time.

摘要

目的

作者研究了Medmont M600中央10度程序(澳大利亚维多利亚州坎伯韦尔市Medmont PTY有限公司)在识别美国加利福尼亚州圣莱安德罗市汉弗莱仪器公司汉弗莱程序10 - 2上所绘制的旁中心注视威胁方面的敏感性和特异性。

方法

对62例青光眼患者的62只眼睛进行了汉弗莱自动阈值视野检查(程序10 - 2)和Medmont M600自动阈值视野检查(中央10度程序),并对其视野中的旁中心点状缺损进行了研究。分析了Medmont中央10度程序的敏感性和特异性。

结果

在检测汉弗莱程序10 - 2上的视野缺损时,Medmont M600中央10度视野在1度范围内的敏感性和特异性分别为78%和81%,在3度范围内分别为95%和83%。Medmont M600中央10度阈值视野测试所需时间占汉弗莱阈值10 - 2视野检查所需测试时间的36%。

结论

Medmont视野计在进行中央阈值测试时似乎效率较高,并且显著缩短了测试时间。

相似文献

1
The ability of Medmont M600 automated perimetry to detect threats to fixation.Medmont M600自动视野计检测注视威胁的能力。
J Glaucoma. 1997 Aug;6(4):259-62.
2
The efficacy of the dicon screening field to detect eyes with glaucomatous field loss by Humphrey threshold testing.通过 Humphrey 阈值测试,双视野筛查区域检测青光眼性视野缺损眼睛的效能。
J Glaucoma. 1998 Jun;7(3):158-64.
3
Visual-field defects in well-defined retinal lesions using Humphrey and Dicon perimeters.使用 Humphrey 和 Dicon 视野计检测明确视网膜病变中的视野缺损。
Optometry. 2000 Oct;71(10):643-52.
4
Kinetic and static fixation methods in automated threshold perimetry.自动视野计中的动态和静态固定方法。
J Glaucoma. 1999 Oct;8(5):290-6.
5
Comparison of the Humphrey Field Analyser and Humphrey Matrix Perimeter for the evaluation of glaucoma patients.
Ophthalmologica. 2008;222(6):400-7. doi: 10.1159/000154203. Epub 2008 Sep 10.
6
Performance of frequency-doubling technology perimetry in a population-based prevalence survey of glaucoma: the Tajimi study.基于人群的青光眼患病率调查中倍频技术视野检查的表现:田美研究
Ophthalmology. 2007 Jan;114(1):27-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.06.041. Epub 2006 Oct 27.
7
Threshold and variability properties of matrix frequency-doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in glaucoma.青光眼患者中矩阵频率加倍技术和标准自动视野计的阈值及变异性特征
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005 Jul;46(7):2451-7. doi: 10.1167/iovs.05-0135.
8
Comparing threshold visual fields between the Dicon TKS 4000 automated perimeter and the Humphrey Field Analyzer.比较Dicon TKS 4000自动视野计与Humphrey视野分析仪的阈值视野。
J Am Optom Assoc. 1995 Nov;66(11):706-11.
9
[Short-wavelength perimetry in diagnosis of early glaucoma: comparison with standard automated perimetry].[短波长视野检查法在早期青光眼诊断中的应用:与标准自动视野检查法的比较]
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2002 Jan;38(1):31-5.
10
[Application of frequency doubling technology perimetry in the diagnosis of glaucoma].
Klin Oczna. 2002;104(5-6):391-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of the visual field test of Glaufield Lite with Humphrey Field Analyser.Glaufield Lite视野测试与Humphrey视野分析仪的比较。
Int Ophthalmol. 2023 Feb;43(2):557-565. doi: 10.1007/s10792-022-02457-5. Epub 2022 Aug 10.
2
A comparison of global indices between the Medmont Automated Perimeter and the Humphrey Field Analyzer.Medmont自动视野计与Humphrey视野分析仪的整体指标比较。
Br J Ophthalmol. 2007 Oct;91(10):1285-7. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2007.114926. Epub 2007 Mar 27.