• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

知情同意:正确看待风险。

Informed consent: putting risks into perspective.

作者信息

Singh A D, Paling J

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA.

出版信息

Surv Ophthalmol. 1997 Jul-Aug;42(1):83-6. doi: 10.1016/s0039-6257(97)84044-1.

DOI:10.1016/s0039-6257(97)84044-1
PMID:9265704
Abstract

It is difficult, if not impossible, for patients to understand the significance of the involved risks when they are asked to sign informed consent prior to a procedure. Although practitioners seek to be diligent in discussing the significant, albeit remote, risks and benefits of accepting a recommended procedure, risks are usually addressed only in vague terms that may seem irrelevant to the patient. We offer a simple method whereby risk of an untoward event occurring during an ophthalmic procedure is compared with risks involved in daily activity. The Paling Perspective Scale allows better communication of risks between the physician and the patient, and reduces the likelihood of subsequent litigation.

摘要

在手术前要求患者签署知情同意书时,即便并非完全不可能,患者也很难理解所涉风险的重要性。尽管从业者努力勤勉地讨论接受推荐手术的重大风险及益处,即便这些风险很微小,但通常只是用一些模糊的术语来提及风险,而这些术语对患者来说可能显得无关紧要。我们提供一种简单的方法,通过它可以将眼科手术期间发生不良事件的风险与日常活动中涉及的风险进行比较。“帕林视角量表”能使医生和患者之间更好地沟通风险,并降低后续诉讼的可能性。

相似文献

1
Informed consent: putting risks into perspective.知情同意:正确看待风险。
Surv Ophthalmol. 1997 Jul-Aug;42(1):83-6. doi: 10.1016/s0039-6257(97)84044-1.
2
The contours of informed consent.知情同意的要点
Surv Ophthalmol. 1996 Mar-Apr;40(5):391-4. doi: 10.1016/s0039-6257(96)80067-1.
3
[Mental competence for informed consent as a relational model--clinical practice and medical ethics analysis. Comment on the contribution by J. Vollman].[作为关系模型的知情同意的心理能力——临床实践与医学伦理分析。对J. 福尔曼贡献的评论]
Nervenarzt. 2001 Jul;72(7):570-1. doi: 10.1007/s001150170086.
4
[The origin of informed consent].[知情同意的起源]
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2005 Oct;25(5):312-27.
5
Hospital informed consent for procedure forms: facilitating quality patient-physician interaction.医院手术知情同意书:促进优质医患互动
Arch Surg. 2000 Jan;135(1):26-33. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.135.1.26.
6
Informed Consent Challenges in Frail, Delirious, Demented, and Do-Not-Resuscitate Adult Patients.虚弱、谵妄、痴呆及“不要复苏”成年患者的知情同意挑战
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2015 Nov;26(11):1647-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2015.08.011. Epub 2015 Sep 11.
7
A comprehensive primer of surgical informed consent.外科手术知情同意书全面指南。
Surg Clin North Am. 2007 Aug;87(4):903-18, viii. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2007.07.012.
8
Listening to children: have we gone too far (or not far enough)?倾听儿童心声:我们是否做得太过(或做得还不够)?
J R Soc Med. 1998 Sep;91(9):457-61. doi: 10.1177/014107689809100902.
9
Informed consent.知情同意。
Plast Surg Nurs. 2007 Oct-Dec;27(4):206-9. doi: 10.1097/01.PSN.0000306187.80565.0e.
10
Consent for transfusion: is it informed?输血同意书:是否为知情同意?
Transfus Med Rev. 1997 Oct;11(4):274-85.

引用本文的文献

1
How well do commonly used data presentation formats support comparative effectiveness evaluations?常用的数据呈现格式在支持比较疗效评估方面的表现如何?
Med Decis Making. 2012 Nov-Dec;32(6):840-50. doi: 10.1177/0272989X12445284. Epub 2012 May 22.