Durbin D R, Giardino A P, Shaw K N, Harris M C, Silber J H
Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19014, USA.
Pediatrics. 1997 Sep;100(3):E8. doi: 10.1542/peds.100.3.e8.
To determine the effect of insurance status on the likelihood of interhospital transfer for neonates.
Population-based retrospective cohort study.
All general acute care nonpediatric hospitals in the five counties of southeastern Pennsylvania.
Fifty-six thousand, seven hundred eighty-nine infants from 0 to 28 days of age admitted to or born in study hospitals between January 1 and December 31, 1991.
None. MAINS OUTCOME MEASURE: Transfer to another general or specialty acute care hospital.
The incidence (95% confidence interval) of interhospital transfer was 1.69% (1.60, 1.78). Uninsured infants were nearly twice as likely [relative risk (RR) = 1.96 (1.67, 2.31)] to be transferred as commercially insured infants, even when adjusted for the effects of prematurity, severity of illness, and the level of neonatal intensive care unit in the referring hospital. Similarly, infants with Medicaid were more likely to be transferred [RR = 1.20 (1.01, 1.43)] than similar commercially insured neonates. Uninsured and publicly insured infants were also more likely to be born premature [RR 1.49 (1.39, 1. 60)] than privately insured neonates, and were more likely to have both moderate [RR 1.11 (1.04, 1.23)] and high [RR 1.21 (1.11, 1.32)] illness severity on admission to the hospital than privately insured infants.
Neonates with no insurance and those with Medicaid coverage were more likely to be transferred than infants with private insurance. These results are consistent with those of other investigators who have studied financially motivated patient transfers- so-called patient dumping-in nonpediatric populations of patients. Our study may represent the first documentation of this phenomenon in a pediatric population. Our results are also consistent with those of other investigators who have examined the effect of insurance status on maternal interhospital transfer, thus providing further evidence for the existence of financially motivated transfers within regional systems of perinatal care. Future investigation into the effect of economic factors on variation in the utilization of transport services, and on how transfer influences ultimate patient outcome, is needed as managed care health systems become more widespread.
确定保险状况对新生儿院际转运可能性的影响。
基于人群的回顾性队列研究。
宾夕法尼亚州东南部五个县的所有普通急症非儿科医院。
1991年1月1日至12月31日期间在研究医院入院或出生的56789名0至28日龄婴儿。
无。主要观察指标:转至另一家普通或专科急症医院。
院际转运的发生率(95%置信区间)为1.69%(1.60,1.78)。即使对早产、疾病严重程度以及转诊医院新生儿重症监护病房水平的影响进行校正后,未参保婴儿被转运的可能性几乎是商业保险婴儿的两倍[相对风险(RR)=1.96(1.67,2.31)]。同样,与类似的商业保险新生儿相比,有医疗补助的婴儿更有可能被转运[RR = 1.20(1.01,1.43)]。未参保和公共保险的婴儿早产的可能性也高于私人保险的新生儿[RR 1.49(1.39,1.60)],并且入院时病情中度[RR 1.11(1.04,1.23)]和重度[RR 1.21(1.11,1.32)]的可能性均高于私人保险的婴儿。
没有保险和有医疗补助的新生儿比有私人保险的婴儿更有可能被转运。这些结果与其他研究经济因素导致的患者转运(即所谓的患者遗弃)的研究者在非儿科患者群体中的研究结果一致。我们对这一现象的研究可能是儿科人群中首次对此现象的记录。我们的结果也与其他研究保险状况对产妇院际转运影响的研究者的结果一致,从而为围产期区域医疗系统中存在经济因素导致的转运提供了进一步证据。随着管理式医疗保健系统的日益普及,需要进一步研究经济因素对转运服务利用差异的影响,以及转运如何影响最终患者结局。