Green Adrienne, Showstack Jonathan, Rennie Deborah, Goldman Lee
Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of California-San Francisco, Box 0131, 533 Parnassus Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.
Acad Med. 2005 Aug;80(8):774-9. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200508000-00015.
Public hospitals and academic medical centers may admit more poorly insured transfer patients than do other institutions. The authors investigated the relationship of patient insurance status, hospital ownership, and hospital teaching status with interhospital transfers in California.
In 2003, data were derived from the hospital discharge abstract database for the year 2000 from the California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development. Hospitals were categorized by ownership and teaching status; patients were categorized as being "good" or "poor" payers depending on the level of expected insurance reimbursement. Descriptive and multivariate analyses were used to assess the number of poor payer transfers admitted by each hospital group.
In 2000, there were 58,509 transfer and 2,320,479 direct admissions. All hospital groups admitted a higher percentage of good payer than poor payer transfer patients (85% vs. 15% respectively for all groups combined). Adjusted for total number of admissions and teaching status, the number of poor payer transfer patients admitted to county-owned and University of California hospitals was significantly higher than the statewide average (both p values < .001), while the number admitted to independent teaching hospitals was significantly lower than the statewide average (p < .001). The number of poor payer transfer patients admitted to independent teaching hospitals more closely resembled that of for-profit hospitals than that of University of California teaching hospitals.
In 2000, the likelihood of a hospital admitting a transfer patient appears to have been affected by both the patient's insurance status and the hospital's ownership. In general, good payer patients were more likely to be transferred than were poor payer patients, with poor payer transfer patients more likely to be admitted to publicly owned hospitals.
与其他机构相比,公立医院和学术医疗中心可能收治更多保险保障较差的转院患者。作者调查了加利福尼亚州患者保险状况、医院所有制及医院教学地位与医院间转院的关系。
2003年,数据来源于加利福尼亚州全州卫生规划与发展办公室2000年的医院出院摘要数据库。医院按所有制和教学地位分类;患者根据预期保险赔付水平分为“支付能力良好”或“支付能力较差”两类。采用描述性和多变量分析评估各医院组收治的支付能力较差的转院患者数量。
2000年,有58,509例转院患者和2,320,479例直接入院患者。所有医院组收治的支付能力良好的转院患者比例均高于支付能力较差的转院患者(所有组合并后分别为85%和15%)。经入院总数和教学地位调整后,县属医院和加利福尼亚大学各医院收治的支付能力较差的转院患者数量显著高于全州平均水平(p值均<0.001),而独立教学医院收治的此类患者数量显著低于全州平均水平(p<0.001)。独立教学医院收治的支付能力较差的转院患者数量与营利性医院更为相似,而非与加利福尼亚大学教学医院相似。
2000年,医院收治转院患者的可能性似乎受患者保险状况和医院所有制两者影响。一般而言,支付能力良好的患者比支付能力较差的患者更有可能被转院,支付能力较差的转院患者更有可能被公立医院收治。