Hanson P B, Walker R H
Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Scripps Clinic and Research Foundation, La Jolla, California 92037, USA.
J Arthroplasty. 1995 Oct;10(5):683-8. doi: 10.1016/s0883-5403(05)80216-5.
The effectiveness, benefits, and potential risks of employing a total hip arthroplasty cemented femoral component distal centralizer were evaluated. First postoperative (6-week) radiographs of 100 primary hybrid total hip arthroplasties in consecutive groups of 50 patients without and 50 patients with a femoral stem distal centralizer were retrospectively reviewed. Femoral stems with a distal centralizer were more centralized within the femoral canal (center of stem tip to center of intramedullary canal: mean, 1.1 mm with a centralizer, 3.2 mm without; P<.0001) and more neutrally aligned (mean, 0.7 degrees valgus with a centralizer, 1.3 degrees valgus without; P < .01). Femoral stems with a distal centralizer were less likely to have a cement mantle with suboptimal thickness, that is, less than 2 mm at the medial distal femoral stem (3 of 50 stems with a centralizer, 22 of 50 stems without; chi-square, P<.0001). There were no complications, adverse effects on the cement mantle, radiographic evidence of loosening, or implant failures associated with the use of a distal centralizer, with a minimum follow-up period of 2 years.
对使用全髋关节置换骨水泥固定股骨部件远端中心化器的有效性、益处和潜在风险进行了评估。回顾性分析了连续两组各50例患者(一组50例未使用股骨柄远端中心化器,另一组50例使用)进行初次混合式全髋关节置换术后6周的X线片。使用远端中心化器的股骨柄在股骨髓腔内更居中(柄尖中心至髓腔中心:使用中心化器时平均为1.1mm,未使用时为3.2mm;P<0.0001)且对线更中立(使用中心化器时平均外翻0.7度,未使用时为1.3度;P<0.01)。使用远端中心化器的股骨柄出现骨水泥套厚度欠佳(即股骨柄内侧远端小于2mm)的可能性较小(使用中心化器的50个股骨柄中有3个,未使用的50个股骨柄中有22个;卡方检验,P<0.0001)。在至少2年的随访期内,未出现与使用远端中心化器相关的并发症、对骨水泥套的不良影响、假体松动的影像学证据或植入物失败。