Nast-Kolb D, Ruchholtz S, Schweiberer L
Chirurgische Klinik und Poliklinik, Klinikum Innenstadt, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, München.
Orthopade. 1997 Apr;26(4):360-7. doi: 10.1007/PL00003392.
Because of the controversy that exists about therapy for the Pipkin fracture, the treatment and results of 117 fractures of the femoral head were reviewed and re-evaluated at least 1 year after the trauma had taken place. The cases were taken from eight publications in the literature from 1983 to 1995. The lesions in this collection comprised 35% (n = 41) type I, 40% (n = 47) type II, 10% (n = 12) type III and 15% (n = 17) type IV fractures classified after the Pipkin system. Seventy-four percent of patients (n = 87) were operated on; only type I lesions were treated conservatively in 42%, thus more often than average. There were 57 complications with equally frequent head necroses (14.5%) and severe coxarthritis. Coxarthritis was doubled after conservative treatment versus operation (23% vs. 13%). There was no difference in respect to head necrosis. Postoperatively, 18 (14%) periarticular ossifications were registered. Forty-one (75%) of 55 Pipkin I and II fractures had an at least "good" outcome; the portion of conservative treatment was higher than operative treatment (88% vs 69%). Still these results have to be seen with respect to the use of treating simple lesions primarily conservatively with the minimum of 6 weeks of traction therapy, thus counting the latter patients in this group. According to the literature, we think that if there are no vital contraindications, all Pipkin fractures should be treated operatively (early emergency operation) by reattaching bigger fragments and extracting smaller fragments in Pipkin I and II fractures, trying to save the heads in young, active patients with Pipkin III fractures in contrast to primary endoprosthesis in elderly patients with coxarthrosis with Pipkin IV fractures (unstable and displaced fractures of the acetabulum).
由于针对Pipkin骨折的治疗存在争议,我们对117例股骨头骨折患者在创伤发生至少1年后的治疗情况及结果进行了回顾和重新评估。这些病例取自1983年至1995年的八篇文献。按照Pipkin分型系统,该组病例中I型骨折占35%(n = 41),II型骨折占40%(n = 47),III型骨折占10%(n = 12),IV型骨折占15%(n = 17)。74%的患者(n = 87)接受了手术治疗;仅42%的I型损伤采用了保守治疗,这一比例高于平均水平。共有57例并发症,股骨头坏死和严重髋关节炎的发生率相当(均为14.5%)。保守治疗后髋关节炎的发生率是手术治疗后的两倍(23%对13%)。在股骨头坏死方面没有差异。术后记录到18例(14%)关节周围骨化。55例Pipkin I型和II型骨折中有41例(75%)至少获得了“良好”的治疗效果;保守治疗的比例高于手术治疗(88%对69%)。不过,这些结果是基于对简单损伤主要采用保守治疗并至少进行6周牵引治疗得出的,因此将这些患者纳入了该组。根据文献,我们认为如果没有绝对禁忌证,所有Pipkin骨折均应进行手术治疗(早期急诊手术):对于Pipkin I型和II型骨折,应重新固定较大的骨折块并取出较小的骨折块;对于年轻、活动量大的Pipkin III型骨折患者,应尽量保留股骨头,而对于患有髋关节炎的老年Pipkin IV型骨折患者(髋臼不稳定和移位骨折),则应首选人工关节置换。