Suppr超能文献

在接受中耳手术的患者中,预防性使用昂丹司琼与氟哌利多或安慰剂预防术后恶心和呕吐的比较。

Ondansetron versus droperidol or placebo when given prophylactically for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing middle ear procedures.

作者信息

Jellish W S, Thalji Z, Fluter E, Leonetti J P

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL 60153, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Anesth. 1997 Sep;9(6):451-6. doi: 10.1016/s0952-8180(97)00099-8.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To compare the prophylactic administration of ondansetron with droperidol or placebo to determine its effectiveness in reducing postoperative nausea and vomiting after middle ear procedures.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized, double-blind study.

SETTING

Inpatient otolaryngology service at a university medical center.

PATIENTS

120 ASA physical status I and II patients presenting for elective middle ear surgical procedures.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomly assigned to receive either placebo (Group 1), ondansetron 4 mg intravenously (IV) (Group 2), or droperidol 25 mcg/kg i.v. (Group 3) 10 minutes before induction of general anesthesia using thiopental 5 mg/kg i.v. with fentanyl 2 mcg/kg i.v. and maintenance anesthesia with isoflurane 1% to 2% end-tidal in a 50% air/oxygen mixture.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Total surgical, anesthesia, extubation, and postanesthesia care unit (PACU) occupancy times were recorded along with anesthesia recovery scores. The incidence and severity of nausea, vomiting, and pain along with rescue antiemetic administration, also were recorded. Similar assessments were made over the next 24 hours. Intergroup demographic data were similar except that the male to female ratio was higher in the ondansetron group. Stewart scores, reflecting emergence from anesthesia, were higher with ondansetron compared with droperidol. The incidence of nausea was similar between the groups but the severity was less after ondansetron therapy. More patients vomited after placebo than when given either droperidol or ondansetron. No intergroup differences were noted in the use of rescue antiemetics. Twenty-four hours later, more patients who received the placebo drug had nausea or vomited compared with either ondansetron or droperidol.

CONCLUSIONS

Ondansetron 4 mg i.v. is as effective as droperidol and better than placebo in preventing nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing middle ear surgery. No cost advantage as determined by lower use of rescue antiemetics or shorter PACU times was noted after the prophylactic administration of ondansetron.

摘要

研究目的

比较昂丹司琼与氟哌利多或安慰剂的预防性给药,以确定其在减少中耳手术后恶心和呕吐方面的有效性。

设计

前瞻性、随机、双盲研究。

地点

一所大学医学中心的住院耳鼻喉科。

患者

120例美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)身体状况为I级和II级、拟行择期中耳手术的患者。

干预措施

在使用硫喷妥钠5mg/kg静脉注射加芬太尼2mcg/kg静脉注射诱导全身麻醉前10分钟,患者被随机分配接受安慰剂(第1组)、昂丹司琼4mg静脉注射(第2组)或氟哌利多25mcg/kg静脉注射(第3组),并使用1%至2%的异氟烷维持麻醉,终末潮气在50%空气/氧气混合气体中。

测量指标及主要结果

记录总手术时间、麻醉时间、拔管时间和麻醉后监护病房(PACU)停留时间以及麻醉恢复评分。记录恶心、呕吐和疼痛的发生率及严重程度,以及抢救性止吐药的使用情况。在接下来的24小时内进行类似评估。除昂丹司琼组男女比例较高外,组间人口统计学数据相似。与氟哌利多相比,昂丹司琼组反映麻醉苏醒的Stewart评分更高。各组恶心发生率相似,但昂丹司琼治疗后严重程度较低。接受安慰剂的患者呕吐人数多于接受氟哌利多或昂丹司琼的患者。在抢救性止吐药的使用方面未观察到组间差异。24小时后,接受安慰剂的患者恶心或呕吐的人数多于接受昂丹司琼或氟哌利多的患者。

结论

静脉注射4mg昂丹司琼在预防中耳手术患者恶心和呕吐方面与氟哌利多效果相当,且优于安慰剂。预防性给予昂丹司琼后,未发现因抢救性止吐药使用减少或PACU停留时间缩短而带来的成本优势。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验