Dunne M P, Martin N G, Bailey J M, Heath A C, Bucholz K K, Madden P A, Statham D J
School of Public Health, Queensland University of Technology, Australia.
Int J Epidemiol. 1997 Aug;26(4):844-54. doi: 10.1093/ije/26.4.844.
Few studies of sexual attitudes and behaviour have quantified the direction and magnitude of participation bias, primarily because information on non-responders is difficult to obtain in cross-sectional surveys.
Australian adult twins (n = 9112) aged 17-52 years enrolled in a national, longitudinal research register were asked to participate in a postal survey concerning their sexual behaviour and attitudes. Individual consent was determined by separate return of a consent form; 27% explicitly refused, 19% initially agreed to receive a questionnaire, but subsequently did not return consent forms and 52% explicitly consented. Participation data were matched to social, psychological and behavioural information in a longitudinal data set.
People who explicitly consented had higher levels of education, attended church less often, had less conservative sexual attitudes and voting preferences, were more likely to smoke cigarettes and drank alcohol more often than people who explicitly refused. On standard personality scales, responders were more novelty-seeking and reward-dependent and less harm-avoidant than refusers. Structured psychiatric telephone interview data from 3674 individuals showed that, compared to refusers, responders had higher lifetime prevalence of major depression, alcohol dependence and childhood conduct disorder and also reported an earlier age at first sexual intercourse and higher rates of sexual abuse. In general, those who had initially agreed to receive the sex questionnaire but were subsequently lost were more similar to consenters than to refusers.
Effect sizes on most measures were small. The broad profile suggests that postal surveys of sexual attitudes and behaviour may overestimate sexual liberalism, activity and adversity, although this bias should not seriously compromise population estimates.
很少有关于性态度和性行为的研究对参与偏差的方向和程度进行量化,主要是因为在横断面调查中很难获得未回应者的信息。
邀请纳入国家纵向研究登记册的17 - 52岁澳大利亚成年双胞胎(n = 9112)参与一项关于其性行为和态度的邮寄调查。通过单独返还同意书来确定个人同意情况;27%明确拒绝,19%最初同意接收问卷,但随后未返还同意书,52%明确同意。参与数据与纵向数据集中的社会、心理和行为信息相匹配。
与明确拒绝的人相比,明确同意的人受教育程度更高,去教堂的频率更低,性态度和投票偏好不那么保守,更有可能吸烟且饮酒更频繁。在标准人格量表上,回应者比拒绝者更倾向于寻求新奇和依赖奖励,且更不回避伤害。来自3674人的结构化精神科电话访谈数据显示,与拒绝者相比,回应者重度抑郁症、酒精依赖和童年品行障碍的终生患病率更高,并且首次性交年龄更早,性虐待发生率更高。总体而言,那些最初同意接收性问卷但随后失访的人与同意者比与拒绝者更相似。
大多数测量指标的效应大小较小。总体情况表明,关于性态度和性行为的邮寄调查可能高估了性自由主义、性活动和性逆境,尽管这种偏差不应严重影响总体估计。