Suppr超能文献

赖诺普利可改善患有糖尿病肾病的高血压非胰岛素依赖型糖尿病患者的内皮功能障碍。

Lisinopril improves endothelial dysfunction in hypertensive NIDDM subjects with diabetic nephropathy.

作者信息

Nielsen F S, Rossing P, Gall M A, Smidt U M, Chen J W, Sato A, Parving H H

机构信息

Steno Diabetes Center, Gentofte, Denmark.

出版信息

Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 1997 Aug;57(5):427-34. doi: 10.3109/00365519709084591.

Abstract

Endothelial dysfunction is a prevalent phenomenon in non-insulin dependent diabetic (NIDDM) patients with hypertension and albuminuria, and may contribute to the development and progression of cardiovascular disease, which is the main cause of the high morbidity and mortality observed in these patients. Therefore the aim of our study was to evaluate whether inhibition of angiotensin-converting enzyme (with lisinopril 10-20 mg day-1) could ameliorate endothelial dysfunction more than reducing blood pressure with conventional antihypertensive treatment (atenolol 50-100 mg day-1), usually in combination with a diuretic. We performed a 12-month prospective, randomized, double-blind, parallel study in 43 hypertensive NIDDM patients with diabetic nephropathy (21 treated with lisinopril and 22 with atenolol). The following variables were measured: 24-h ambulatory blood pressure (ABP); transcapillary escape rate of albumin (TERalb; i.e. initial disappearance of intravenously injected 125I-labelled human serum albumin); serum concentrations of von Willebrand factor (vWF), using ELISA, and urinary albumin excretion rate (UAE). Data are presented for 32 patients (16 lisinopril and 16 atenolol; age 60 years, SD 8; 25 males) out of 35 who completed the study and had valid measurements of TERalb. At baseline the two groups were comparable; TERalb (8.5 (SEM 0.6) vs. 7.2 (0.4)%); vWF (2.09 (range 0.82-4.34) vs. 1.97 (0.95-3.86) IU ml-1; UAE 916 (x/divided by antilog SEM 1.3) vs. 1444 (1.2), and mean ABP 110 (SEM 3) vs. 113 (2) mmHg, in the lisinopril and atenolol group, respectively. During follow up, the mean ABP was equally reduced in the lisinopril and atenolol group, by 12 (SEM 2) vs. 10 (2) mmHg, respectively, TERalb decreased in the lisinopril group by 0.6 (SEM 0.7)%, whereas it increased in the atenolol group 1.5 (0.5)%; the mean difference was 2.2% (95% CI, 0.5 to 3.9; p = 0.015). UAE was reduced by 45% (95% CI, 25 to 60) in the lisinopril group vs. 10% (-15 to 30) in the atenolol group (p = 0.014). Serum vWF was not changed during follow up in either group. Our study suggests that lisinopril has both reno- and vasculoprotective properties in hypertensive NIDDM patients with diabetic nephropathy.

摘要

内皮功能障碍在患有高血压和蛋白尿的非胰岛素依赖型糖尿病(NIDDM)患者中是一种普遍现象,并且可能促成心血管疾病的发生和发展,而心血管疾病是这些患者中高发病率和高死亡率的主要原因。因此,我们研究的目的是评估与通常联合利尿剂使用的传统抗高血压治疗(阿替洛尔50 - 100mg/天)相比,血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(赖诺普利10 - 20mg/天)是否能更有效地改善内皮功能障碍。我们对43例患有糖尿病肾病的高血压NIDDM患者进行了一项为期12个月的前瞻性、随机、双盲、平行研究(21例接受赖诺普利治疗,22例接受阿替洛尔治疗)。测量了以下变量:24小时动态血压(ABP);白蛋白的跨毛细血管逃逸率(TERalb;即静脉注射125I标记的人血清白蛋白的初始消失率);采用酶联免疫吸附测定法测定的血管性血友病因子(vWF)的血清浓度,以及尿白蛋白排泄率(UAE)。在完成研究并对TERalb进行有效测量的35例患者中,给出了32例患者(16例赖诺普利组和16例阿替洛尔组;年龄60岁,标准差8;25例男性)的数据。在基线时,两组具有可比性;TERalb(8.5(标准误0.6)%vs.7.2(0.4)%);vWF(2.09(范围0.82 - 4.34)IU/ml vs.1.97(0.95 - 3.86)IU/ml;UAE 916(x/反对数标准误1.3)vs.1444(1.2),以及平均ABP在赖诺普利组和阿替洛尔组分别为110(标准误3)mmHg和113(2)mmHg。在随访期间,赖诺普利组和阿替洛尔组的平均ABP均有同等程度的降低,分别降低了12(标准误2)mmHg和10(2)mmHg,TERalb在赖诺普利组降低了0.6(标准误0.7)%,而在阿替洛尔组升高了1.5(0.5)%;平均差异为2.2%(95%可信区间,0.5至3.9;p = 0.015)。赖诺普利组的UAE降低了45%(95%可信区间,25至60),而阿替洛尔组降低了10%( - 15至30)(p = 0.014)。两组在随访期间血清vWF均未发生变化。我们的研究表明,赖诺普利对患有糖尿病肾病的高血压NIDDM患者具有肾脏和血管保护特性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验