Greene K A, Dickman C A, Marciano F F, Drabier J B, Hadley M N, Sonntag V K
Division of Neurological Surgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, Mercy Healthcare Arizona, Phoenix, USA.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997 Aug 15;22(16):1843-52. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199708150-00009.
Retrospective review of acute axis fractures treated at a tertiary referral center.
To determine the optimal treatment of axis fractures based on 340 cases from a single institution.
Axis fractures account for almost 20% of acute cervical spine fractures. However, their management and the clinical criteria predictive of nonoperative failure remain unclear.
Admission imaging studies and clinical variables were obtained for 340 consecutive axis fracture patients. Fractures were classified as as odontoid Type I, II, or III with dena displacement on admission roentgenograms; hangman's fractures of Francis grade and Effendi type; and miscellaneous fractures. Treatment methods were documented, and outcomes were based on dynamic lateral roentgenograms, clinical examination, or telephone interviews at last follow-up.
Follow-up data were available in 92% of cases. Type II odontoid fractures comprised 35% of all axis fractures, were the most difficult to treat, and had the highest nonunion rate (28.4%). Odontoid displacement of 6 mm or more was associated with Type II nonunion (chi-square = 33.74, P < 0.0001). Patients underwent surgical fusion if fracture alignment could not be maintained by an external orthosis, or if they had odontoid fractures with transverse ligament disruption, Type II odontoid fractures with dens displacement of at least 6 mm, or hangman's fractures of severe Francis grade or Effendi type.
Type II odontoid fractures have the highest nonunion rate and were associated with dens displacement of 6 mm or greater. Early surgical fusion is recommended for acute fracture instability despite external immobilization, transverse ligament disruption, Type II odontoid fractures with dens displacement of at least 6 mm on admission, or severe Francis grade or Effendi-type hangman's fractures. Otherwise, nonoperative management is sufficient.
对一家三级转诊中心治疗的急性枢椎骨折进行回顾性研究。
基于来自单一机构的340例病例确定枢椎骨折的最佳治疗方法。
枢椎骨折约占急性颈椎骨折的20%。然而,其治疗方法以及预测非手术治疗失败的临床标准仍不明确。
收集了340例连续的枢椎骨折患者的入院影像学检查和临床变量。骨折根据入院X线片上的齿突移位情况分为I型、II型或III型齿突骨折;弗朗西斯分级和埃芬迪类型的绞刑者骨折;以及其他骨折。记录治疗方法,结局基于最后随访时的动态侧位X线片、临床检查或电话访谈。
92%的病例有随访数据。II型齿突骨折占所有枢椎骨折的35%,最难治疗,骨不连发生率最高(28.4%)。齿突移位6mm或以上与II型骨不连相关(卡方检验=33.74,P<0.0001)。如果骨折对线不能通过外部矫形器维持,或者患者有齿突骨折合并横韧带断裂、II型齿突骨折且齿突移位至少6mm、或严重弗朗西斯分级或埃芬迪类型的绞刑者骨折,则进行手术融合。
II型齿突骨折骨不连发生率最高,与齿突移位6mm或更大有关。对于急性骨折不稳定,尽管有外部固定、横韧带断裂、入院时II型齿突骨折且齿突移位至少6mm、或严重弗朗西斯分级或埃芬迪类型的绞刑者骨折,建议早期手术融合。否则,非手术治疗就足够了。