• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[来自内科重症监护病房2054例患者的流行病学和预后数据]

[Epidemiological and prognostic data from 2054 patients of an internal medicine intensive care unit].

作者信息

Bodmann K F, Ehlers B, Häbel U, Ritschel P, Rühmkorf K

机构信息

Medizinische Klinik I, Städtisches Krankenhaus Hildesheim.

出版信息

Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1997 Jul 25;122(30):919-25. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1047709.

DOI:10.1055/s-2008-1047709
PMID:9280704
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Computer-based data collection and objective gathering of degree of illness severity and risk of death with a prognostic scoring system make it possible to obtain, in addition to epidemiological and aetiological data, risk-related outcome values for patients in an intensive care unit.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All 2054 patients who during a 2-year period (1995-1996) had stayed in a medical intensive care unit (MICU) for more than 4 hours were studied prospectively. The simplified acute physiology score II (SAPS II), risk of death, duration of stay in the MICU and in the hospital, and death rates during MICU and hospital stay were determined. Mean and median values and histograms of the various parameters as well as the standardized mortality index (SMI: observed/ predicted death rate with 99% confidence limits) were calculated for each of the patients and certain defined subgroups (basic disease, age, risk). Receiver operating characteristics curves (discrimination) and calibration curves were obtained for SAPS II.

RESULTS

Mean age for the cohort was 59.8 years, duration of stay in the MICU 3.1 days, in hospital 14.7 days, SAPS II was 30.3 points, death risk 0.17, death rate during ICU stay was 8.3%, during hospital stay 13.9% and the SMI 0.8% (0.74-0.88). Cardiac disease was the most common underlying condition (60%), while the small group of neurological conditions was remarkable for the high degree of severity and unfavourable prognosis. Both death rate and degree of disease severity increased with age. But the SMI was not significantly higher than 1.0 in both the elderly patients and the high-risk group of patients (on ventilator, renal replacement procedures, death risk > 0.5).

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients in a MICU have underlying cardiac disease. Permanently available neurological consultation is essential. The high hospital death rate for elderly patients and those requiring respiratory support is a problem of disease severity, not of the quality of treatment. The risk of death is high on transfer to a general ward. Determination of the SMI is recommended for internal quality control in an ICU.

摘要

背景

基于计算机的数据收集以及使用预后评分系统客观收集疾病严重程度和死亡风险,使得除了流行病学和病因学数据之外,还能够获取重症监护病房患者的风险相关结局值。

患者与方法

对在两年期间(1995 - 1996年)入住内科重症监护病房(MICU)超过4小时的所有2054例患者进行前瞻性研究。确定简化急性生理学评分II(SAPS II)、死亡风险、在MICU和医院的住院时间以及在MICU和住院期间的死亡率。计算了每位患者以及某些特定定义亚组(基础疾病、年龄、风险)的各种参数的均值、中位数和直方图以及标准化死亡率指数(SMI:观察到的/预测的死亡率,置信区间为99%)。获得了SAPS II的受试者工作特征曲线(辨别力)和校准曲线。

结果

该队列的平均年龄为59.8岁,在MICU的住院时间为3.1天,在医院的住院时间为14.7天,SAPS II为30.3分,死亡风险为0.17,在ICU住院期间的死亡率为8.3%,在住院期间为13.9%,SMI为0.8%(0.74 - 0.88)。心脏病是最常见的基础疾病(60%),而一小部分神经系统疾病因其严重程度高和预后不良而引人注目。死亡率和疾病严重程度均随年龄增加。但在老年患者和高危患者组(使用呼吸机、进行肾脏替代治疗、死亡风险>0.5)中,SMI均未显著高于1.0。

结论

MICU中的大多数患者患有基础心脏病。长期提供神经科会诊至关重要。老年患者和需要呼吸支持的患者的高医院死亡率是疾病严重程度的问题,而非治疗质量的问题。转至普通病房时死亡风险很高。建议在ICU中使用SMI进行内部质量控制。

相似文献

1
[Epidemiological and prognostic data from 2054 patients of an internal medicine intensive care unit].[来自内科重症监护病房2054例患者的流行病学和预后数据]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1997 Jul 25;122(30):919-25. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1047709.
2
Is the SAPS II score valid in surgical intensive care unit patients?SAPS II 评分在外科重症监护病房患者中是否有效?
J Eval Clin Pract. 2012 Apr;18(2):231-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01559.x. Epub 2010 Sep 22.
3
Evaluation of single intensive care unit performance by simplified acute physiology score II system.采用简化急性生理学评分II系统评估单个重症监护病房的绩效
Croat Med J. 2005 Dec;46(6):964-9.
4
[Analysis of outcome quality control in intensive care medicine using the Simplified Acute Physiology Score II].使用简化急性生理学评分II对重症医学中的结局质量控制进行分析
Med Klin (Munich). 1996 Jun 15;91(6):343-8.
5
["Simplified Acute Physiology Score" (SAPS II) ina the assessment of severity of illness in surgical intensive care patients].["简化急性生理学评分(SAPS II)在外科重症监护患者疾病严重程度评估中的应用"]
Chirurg. 2002 May;73(5):439-42. doi: 10.1007/s00104-001-0374-4.
6
[Predictive value of score parameters of the Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS)-II for the duration of treatment of intensive care patients].[简化急性生理学评分(SAPS)-II评分参数对重症监护患者治疗时长的预测价值]
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 1996;108(15):462-6.
7
[Eleven years of core data set in intensive care medicine. Severity of disease and workload are increasing].[重症医学十一年核心数据集。疾病严重程度和工作量不断增加]
Anaesthesist. 2014 Dec;63(12):942-50. doi: 10.1007/s00101-014-2389-5. Epub 2014 Nov 8.
8
Predicting outcome in the intensive care unit using scoring systems: is new better? A comparison of SAPS and SAPS II in a cohort of 1,393 patients. GiViTi Investigators (Gruppo Italiano per la Valutazione degli interventi in Terapia Intensiva). Simplified Acute Physiology Score.使用评分系统预测重症监护病房的预后:新的就更好吗?1393例患者队列中简化急性生理学评分(SAPS)与SAPS II的比较。GiViTi研究人员(意大利重症治疗干预评估小组)。简化急性生理学评分
Med Care. 1998 Sep;36(9):1371-82. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199809000-00009.
9
Performance of SAPS II according to ICU length of stay: A Danish nationwide cohort study.SAPS II 评分在 ICU 住院时间中的表现:一项丹麦全国队列研究。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2019 Oct;63(9):1200-1209. doi: 10.1111/aas.13415. Epub 2019 Jun 14.
10
AIDS in a medical intensive care unit: immediate prognosis and long-term survival.医学重症监护病房中的艾滋病:近期预后与长期生存情况
JAMA. 1996 Oct 16;276(15):1240-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Performance of the score systems Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II and III at an interdisciplinary intensive care unit, after customization.定制后,急性生理学与慢性健康状况评估II和III评分系统在跨学科重症监护病房的表现。
Crit Care. 2001;5(1):31-6. doi: 10.1186/cc975. Epub 2001 Jan 5.