Kerppola T K
Howard Hughes Medical Institute and Department of Biological Chemistry, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-0650, USA.
Biochemistry. 1997 Sep 9;36(36):10872-84. doi: 10.1021/bi971119w.
Studies of DNA bending by Fos and Jun using different methods have yielded contradictory results. Whereas gel electrophoretic phasing analysis indicates that Fos and Jun bend DNA, results obtained through X-ray crystallography and ligase-catalyzed cyclization suggest that they do not. To test the assumptions underlying phasing analysis and to examine DNA bending by Fos and Jun, a multifactorial phasing analysis approach based on the distinct electrophoretic mobilities of DNA fragments of diverse shapes was developed. In this approach, the spacing between the bends, the length of sequences flanking the bends, and the acrylamide concentration in the gel are varied. Two closely spaced intrinsic bends with long flanking sequences had the same effect on electrophoretic mobility as a single bend corresponding to the sum of the bends when they were arranged in phase, and the difference between the bends when they were arranged out of phase. Based on the phase-dependent electrophoretic mobility variation of fragments containing intrinsic DNA bends of different magnitudes, three criteria for determination whether the phase-dependent mobility variation of protein-DNA complexes is caused by DNA bending were adopted. Complexes formed by the bZIP domains of Fos and Jun fulfilled each of these criteria. First, the electrophoretic mobility variation induced by Fos and Jun was proportional to that caused by an intrinsic bend over a broad range of acrylamide concentrations. Second, the mobility difference between fragments containing in phase and out of phase bends was reduced by an increase in the separation between the bends. The separation between the bends had the same effect on the electrophoretic mobility variation caused by Fos and Jun as well as intrinsic bends on long DNA fragments at low acrylamide concentrations. Third, on short DNA fragments analyzed at high acrylamide concentrations, two intrinsic bends separated by long spacers caused a larger decrease in electrophoretic mobility when they were out of phase than when they were in phase. This reversal of the phase dependence of the electrophoretic mobility variation was also observed for complexes formed by truncated Fos and Jun. Thus, the phase-dependent mobility variation of Fos and Jun complexes is due to DNA bending.
运用不同方法对Fos和Jun使DNA弯曲进行的研究得出了相互矛盾的结果。凝胶电泳相位分析表明Fos和Jun会使DNA弯曲,而通过X射线晶体学和连接酶催化环化得到的结果则表明它们不会。为了检验相位分析所依据的假设并研究Fos和Jun对DNA的弯曲作用,开发了一种基于不同形状DNA片段独特电泳迁移率的多因素相位分析方法。在这种方法中,弯曲之间的间距、弯曲侧翼序列的长度以及凝胶中的丙烯酰胺浓度会发生变化。当两个间距紧密且侧翼序列较长的固有弯曲相位相同时,它们对电泳迁移率的影响与一个对应于两个弯曲之和的单一弯曲相同;当它们相位不同时,则体现出弯曲之间的差异。基于含有不同大小固有DNA弯曲的片段的相位依赖性电泳迁移率变化,采用了三条标准来确定蛋白质-DNA复合物的相位依赖性迁移率变化是否由DNA弯曲引起。Fos和Jun的bZIP结构域形成的复合物满足了所有这些标准。首先,在广泛的丙烯酰胺浓度范围内,Fos和Jun诱导的电泳迁移率变化与固有弯曲引起的变化成正比。其次,含有相位相同和相位不同弯曲的片段之间的迁移率差异会随着弯曲之间间距的增加而减小。在低丙烯酰胺浓度下,弯曲之间的间距对Fos和Jun以及长DNA片段上的固有弯曲所引起的电泳迁移率变化具有相同的影响。第三,在高丙烯酰胺浓度下分析的短DNA片段上,由长间隔隔开的两个固有弯曲在相位不同时比相位相同时导致更大的电泳迁移率降低。对于截短的Fos和Jun形成的复合物,也观察到了这种电泳迁移率变化的相位依赖性的反转。因此,Fos和Jun复合物的相位依赖性迁移率变化是由于DNA弯曲所致。