Hachamovitch R, Berman D S, Kiat H, Cohen I, Lewin H, Amanullah A, Kang X, Friedman J, Diamond G A
Department of Imaging, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, and UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California 90048, USA.
Am J Cardiol. 1997 Aug 15;80(4):426-33. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(97)00390-1.
We examined 1,159 consecutive patients who underwent adenosine stress dual isotope single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and had follow-up performed at a mean of 27.5 +/- 9.1 months (94% complete) for hard events (cardiac death and myocardial infarction) and referral to cardiac catheterization after nuclear testing. During follow-up, 120 hard events occurred (11.0% hard event rate; 72 cardiac deaths [6.7% cardiac death rate] and 57 myocardial infarctions [5.3% myocardial infarction rate]). Cox proportional hazards analysis revealed that nuclear testing added incremental value after adjusting for clinical and historical variables (global chi-square increased 13 to 98 for cardiac death as the end point, global chi-square increased 19 to 105 for hard events as the end point; p <0.0001 for both). Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated that after clinical risk stratification of the patient population, the results of nuclear testing were further able to significantly stratify both low- and intermediate- to high-risk patients. Patients with both normal and mildly abnormal scans were at low risk of cardiac death (<1% cardiac death per year of follow-up) and the risk of events increased significantly with worsening scan result. Multivariable analysis revealed that the only predictor of referral to catheterization was the extent and severity of reversible defect present on the scan. Referral rates to early catheterization were very low in patients with normal scans and increased significantly as a function of worsening scan results. In patients who underwent myocardial perfusion SPECT using adenosine stress, the results of nuclear testing yielded incremental prognostic information and clinically relevant risk stratification. Referring physicians predominantly utilized nuclear information when referring patients to catheterization after nuclear testing and do so at rates comparable with those after exercise SPECT despite the higher risk of events in patients undergoing pharmacologic stress.
我们对1159例连续接受腺苷负荷双同位素单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)的患者进行了研究,并对其进行了平均27.5±9.1个月(94%完成随访)的随访,以观察严重事件(心源性死亡和心肌梗死)以及核素检查后转介至心脏导管检查的情况。在随访期间,发生了120例严重事件(严重事件发生率为11.0%;72例心源性死亡[心源性死亡率为6.7%]和57例心肌梗死[心肌梗死发生率为5.3%])。Cox比例风险分析显示,在调整临床和病史变量后,核素检查增加了预测价值(以心源性死亡为终点,全局卡方值从13增加到98;以严重事件为终点,全局卡方值从19增加到105;两者p均<0.0001)。Kaplan-Meier分析表明,在对患者群体进行临床风险分层后,核素检查结果能够进一步显著区分低风险和中高风险患者。扫描结果正常和轻度异常的患者心源性死亡风险较低(随访每年心源性死亡率<1%),且事件风险随扫描结果恶化而显著增加。多变量分析显示,转介至导管检查的唯一预测因素是扫描显示的可逆性缺损的范围和严重程度。扫描结果正常的患者早期导管检查转介率非常低,且随着扫描结果恶化而显著增加。在接受腺苷负荷心肌灌注SPECT的患者中,核素检查结果提供了额外的预后信息和临床相关的风险分层。转诊医生在核素检查后将患者转介至导管检查时主要利用核素信息,尽管接受药物负荷的患者事件风险较高,但其转介率与运动SPECT后相当。