• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Consumer information development and use.消费者信息的开发与使用。
Health Care Financ Rev. 1996 Fall;18(1):15-30.
2
Role of consumer information in today's health care system.消费者信息在当今医疗保健系统中的作用。
Health Care Financ Rev. 1996 Fall;18(1):1-8.
3
What does it all mean? Making sense of health plan data.这一切意味着什么?理解健康计划数据。
Mod Healthc. 1998 Apr 20;28(16):98-106.
4
Measuring health plan performance: sample report formats.衡量健康计划绩效:样本报告格式
Qual Lett Healthc Lead. 1995 Feb;7(1):19-22.
5
Measure by measures. Policy.步步为营。政策。
Hosp Health Netw. 1996 Mar 20;70(6):53-4, 56.
6
Marketplace. Can health plan report cards spur competition on quality?市场。健康保险计划评级能促进质量竞争吗?
Faulkner Grays Med Health. 1997 Jul 7;51(27):suppl 2 p..
7
Consumer perspectives on information needs for health plan choice.消费者对健康计划选择信息需求的看法。
Health Care Financ Rev. 1996 Fall;18(1):55-73.
8
Interview with Margaret O'Kane, President of the National Committee for Quality Assurance.对国家质量保证委员会主席玛格丽特·奥凯恩的采访。
Manag Care Q. 2001 Winter;9(1):5-8.
9
A checklist for consumer-centered health plans.以消费者为中心的健康计划清单。
Healthplan. 1999 Sep-Oct;40(5):67-8, 70.
10
A community quality initiative for health care reform.一项医疗保健改革的社区质量倡议。
Manag Care Q. 1994 Winter;2(1):6-16.

引用本文的文献

1
An international comparison of web-based reporting about health care quality: content analysis.基于网络的医疗保健质量报告的国际比较:内容分析
J Med Internet Res. 2010 Apr 13;12(2):e8. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1191.
2
Understanding the reporting practices of CAHPS sponsors.了解CAHPS赞助商的报告做法。
Health Care Financ Rev. 2007 Spring;28(3):17-30.
3
Measures and predictors of Medicare knowledge: a review of the literature.医疗保险知识的衡量方法与预测因素:文献综述
Health Care Financ Rev. 2006 Summer;27(4):1-12.
4
How do patients choose physicians? Evidence from a national survey of enrollees in employment-related health plans.患者如何选择医生?来自一项针对参加与就业相关健康计划的参保人的全国性调查的证据。
Health Serv Res. 2003 Apr;38(2):711-32. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.00141.
5
Can high quality overcome consumer resistance to restricted provider access? Evidence from a health plan choice experiment.高质量能否克服消费者对受限医疗服务提供者选择的抵触情绪?来自一项健康计划选择实验的证据。
Health Serv Res. 2002 Jun;37(3):551-71. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.00037.
6
Do employees use report cards to assess health care provider systems?员工是否使用报告卡来评估医疗服务提供系统?
Health Serv Res. 2001 Jul;36(3):509-30.
7
Creating more effective health plan quality reports for consumers: lessons from a synthesis of qualitative testing.为消费者创建更有效的健康计划质量报告:定性测试综合分析的经验教训
Health Serv Res. 2001 Jul;36(3):447-76.
8
Qualitative research and the profound grasp of the obvious.定性研究与对显而易见之事的深刻理解。
Health Serv Res. 1999 Dec;34(5 Pt 2):1119-36.
9
No exit? The effect of health status on dissatisfaction and disenrollment from health plans.无路可退?健康状况对健康保险计划不满及退出的影响。
Health Serv Res. 1999 Jun;34(2):547-76.
10
Medicare beneficiary counseling programs: what are they and do they work?医疗保险受益咨询项目:它们是什么以及它们有效吗?
Health Care Financ Rev. 1996 Fall;18(1):127-40.

本文引用的文献

1
Condition-specific performance information: assessing salience, comprehension, and approaches for communicating quality.特定病情的性能信息:评估突出性、理解情况以及传达质量的方法。
Health Care Financ Rev. 1996 Fall;18(1):95-109.
2
Toward a 21st century quality-measurement system for managed-care organizations.迈向21世纪管理式医疗组织的质量测量系统。
Health Care Financ Rev. 1995 Summer;16(4):25-37.
3
Modifying managed competition to address cost and quality.调整管理式竞争以解决成本和质量问题。
Health Aff (Millwood). 1996 Spring;15(1):23-38. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.15.1.23.
4
Involving consumers in quality of care assessment.让消费者参与医疗质量评估。
Health Aff (Millwood). 1988 Spring;7(1):33-48. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.7.1.33.
5
The quality of care. How can it be assessed?护理质量。如何对其进行评估?
JAMA. 1988;260(12):1743-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.260.12.1743.

消费者信息的开发与使用。

Consumer information development and use.

作者信息

McCormack L A, Garfinkel S A, Schnaier J A, Lee A J, Sangl J A

机构信息

Health Economics Research, Inc., Waltham, MA 02154, USA.

出版信息

Health Care Financ Rev. 1996 Fall;18(1):15-30.

PMID:10165029
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4193617/
Abstract

The availability of informational materials to aid consumer health care purchasing decisions is increasing. Organizations developing and disseminating materials include public- and private-sector employers, providers, purchasing cooperatives, State agencies, counseling programs, and accreditation bodies. Based on case study interviews with 24 organizations, we learned that 10 included consumer satisfaction ratings and performance measures based on medical records. An additional four organizations developed materials with consumer satisfaction ratings exclusively. Printed materials were the most common medium used to convey information to consumers. However, other mechanisms for conveying the information were also employed. On the whole, the materials have not been rigorously evaluated. Evaluations are needed to determine if consumers find the information useful and how different individuals prefer to receive the information.

摘要

有助于消费者医疗保健购买决策的信息材料的可获取性正在增加。开发和传播这些材料的组织包括公共和私营部门雇主、提供者、采购合作社、州机构、咨询项目以及认证机构。通过对24个组织的案例研究访谈,我们了解到其中10个组织纳入了基于医疗记录的消费者满意度评级和绩效指标。另外4个组织专门开发了带有消费者满意度评级的材料。印刷材料是向消费者传达信息最常用的媒介。然而,也采用了其他传达信息的机制。总体而言,这些材料尚未经过严格评估。需要进行评估以确定消费者是否认为这些信息有用,以及不同个体更喜欢如何接收信息。