Stern M A, Dahl R, Nielsen L P, Pedersen B, Schrewelius C
Midlands Asthma and Allergy Research Association (MAARA), Leicester General Hospital, United Kingdom.
Am J Rhinol. 1997 Jul-Aug;11(4):323-30. doi: 10.2500/105065897781446658.
The efficacy of aqueous suspensions of budesonide nasal spray and fluticasone propionate nasal spray, in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis, was compared in a large, placebo-controlled, two-center study. A 1-week baseline period was followed by a 4- to 6-week treatment period during which 635 adult patients, aged 18-72 years, were randomized to receive either placebo, budesonide 128 micrograms, or 256 micrograms once daily, or fluticasone propionate, 200 micrograms once daily. Nasal and eye symptoms, overall treatment efficacy and safety assessments were made during the study period. Combined, as well as individual, nasal symptoms were significantly improved in all three active treatment groups compared with placebo therapy. Treatment with 256 micrograms/day of budesonide was found to be significantly more effective in reducing the sneezing score compared with 200 micrograms/day of fluticasone propionate. Analysis of symptom scores on days when the pollen count was greater than 10 grains/m3 revealed 256 micrograms/day of budesonide therapy to be significantly more effective in reducing combined symptom scores as well as the individual scores for sneezing and runny nose, compared with 200 micrograms/day fluticasone propionate. The higher dose of budesonide (256 micrograms/day) was also more effective than the lower dose (128 micrograms/day) in reducing sneezing scores and statistical significance was almost reached for the reduction in combined symptom and runny nose scores. Substantial or total control of symptoms was achieved by 31.4%, 85.3%, 88.4%, and 81.9% of patients receiving placebo, 128 micrograms/day of budesonide, 256 micrograms/day of budesonide, and 200 micrograms/day of fluticasone propionate, respectively. The incidence of adverse events was low in all treatment groups. In conclusion, both budesonide and fluticasone propionate treatments were effective and well-tolerated in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis. However, 256 micrograms/day of budesonide tended to be more effective than 200 micrograms/day of fluticasone propionate and 128 micrograms/day of budesonide, especially when patients were exposed to a higher pollen load.
在一项大型、安慰剂对照、双中心研究中,比较了布地奈德鼻喷雾剂和丙酸氟替卡松鼻喷雾剂的水悬液治疗季节性变应性鼻炎的疗效。在1周的基线期之后是4至6周的治疗期,在此期间,635名年龄在18至72岁的成年患者被随机分配接受安慰剂、每日一次128微克或256微克的布地奈德,或每日一次200微克的丙酸氟替卡松。在研究期间进行了鼻部和眼部症状、总体治疗疗效和安全性评估。与安慰剂治疗相比,所有三个活性治疗组的综合以及个体鼻部症状均有显著改善。发现每日256微克布地奈德治疗在降低喷嚏评分方面比每日200微克丙酸氟替卡松显著更有效。对花粉计数大于10粒/立方米的日子的症状评分分析显示,与每日200微克丙酸氟替卡松相比,每日256微克布地奈德治疗在降低综合症状评分以及喷嚏和流涕的个体评分方面显著更有效。较高剂量的布地奈德(每日256微克)在降低喷嚏评分方面也比低剂量(每日128微克)更有效,并且在降低综合症状和流涕评分方面几乎达到统计学显著性。接受安慰剂、每日128微克布地奈德、每日256微克布地奈德和每日200微克丙酸氟替卡松的患者中,分别有31.4%、85.3%、88.4%和81.9%实现了症状的实质性或完全控制。所有治疗组的不良事件发生率都很低。总之,布地奈德和丙酸氟替卡松治疗季节性变应性鼻炎均有效且耐受性良好。然而,每日256微克布地奈德往往比每日200微克丙酸氟替卡松和每日128微克布地奈德更有效,尤其是当患者暴露于较高花粉负荷时。