Moore M, Onorato I M, McCray E, Castro K G
Division of Tuberculosis Elimination, National Center for HIV, STD, and TB Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA.
JAMA. 1997 Sep 10;278(10):833-7.
With the resurgence of tuberculosis (TB) disease in the late 1980s and early 1990s in the United States, multidrug-resistant (MDR) TB emerged as a serious challenge to TB control. In response, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in 1993 added drug susceptibility test results to the information collected for the national surveillance system to monitor trends in drug resistance.
To determine the extent of drug-resistant tuberculosis (TB) in the United States.
Descriptive analysis of TB surveillance data.
Patients reported to the national TB surveillance system as confirmed TB cases with culture-positive disease from 1993 through 1996 by the 50 states, New York City, and the District of Columbia (DC).
Percentage of case patients with culture-positive disease whose isolates are resistant to specific anti-TB drugs.
Overall resistance to at least isoniazid was 8.4%; rifampin, 3.0%; both isoniazid and rifampin (ie, MDR TB), 2.2%; pyrazinamide, 3.0%; streptomycin, 6.2%; and ethambutol hydrochloride, 2.2%. Rates of resistance were significantly higher for case patients with a prior TB episode. Among those without prior TB, isoniazid resistance of 4% or more was found in 41 states, New York City, and DC. A total of 1457 MDR TB cases were reported from 42 states, New York City, and DC; however, 38% were reported from New York City. Rates of isoniazid and streptomycin resistance were higher for cases among foreign-born compared with US-born patients [corrected] but rates of rifampin resistance and MDR TB were similar. Among US-born patients, resistance to first-line drugs, particularly rifampin monoresistance, was significantly higher among those with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection.
Compared with recent US surveys in 1991 and 1992, isoniazid resistance has remained relatively stable. In addition, the percentage of MDR TB has decreased, although the national trend was significantly influenced by the marked decrease in New York City. Foreign-born and HIV-positive patients and those with prior TB have higher rates of resistance. The widespread extent of isoniazid resistance confirms the need for drug susceptibility testing to guide optimal treatment of patients with culture-positive disease.
20世纪80年代末90年代初美国结核病(TB)疫情卷土重来,耐多药结核病(MDR-TB)成为结核病控制工作面临的严峻挑战。作为应对措施,美国疾病控制与预防中心于1993年将药敏试验结果纳入国家监测系统收集的信息中,以监测耐药性趋势。
确定美国耐多药结核病的范围。
对结核病监测数据进行描述性分析。
1993年至1996年期间,由50个州、纽约市和哥伦比亚特区(DC)上报至国家结核病监测系统的确诊结核病病例且痰培养阳性的患者。
痰培养阳性病例中分离菌株对特定抗结核药物耐药的百分比。
至少对异烟肼耐药的总体比例为8.4%;对利福平耐药的比例为3.0%;对异烟肼和利福平均耐药(即耐多药结核病)的比例为2.2%;对吡嗪酰胺耐药的比例为3.0%;对链霉素耐药的比例为6.2%;对盐酸乙胺丁醇耐药的比例为2.2%。既往有结核病发作史的病例患者耐药率显著更高。在无既往结核病的患者中,41个州、纽约市和哥伦比亚特区发现异烟肼耐药率达4%或更高。42个州、纽约市和哥伦比亚特区共报告了1457例耐多药结核病病例;然而,其中38%来自纽约市。与美国本土出生的患者相比,外国出生的病例中异烟肼和链霉素耐药率更高[校正后],但利福平耐药率和耐多药结核病发生率相似。在美国本土出生的患者中,感染人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)的患者对一线药物的耐药率,尤其是对利福平单耐药率显著更高。
与1991年和1992年美国近期的调查相比,异烟肼耐药率相对保持稳定。此外,耐多药结核病的百分比有所下降,尽管全国趋势受到纽约市显著下降的明显影响。外国出生和HIV阳性患者以及既往有结核病的患者耐药率更高。异烟肼耐药的广泛程度证实了进行药敏试验以指导痰培养阳性患者优化治疗的必要性。