Borgstein P J, Gordijn R V, Eijsbouts Q A, Cuesta M A
Department of Surgery, Academic Hospital, Vrije Universiteit, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Surg Endosc. 1997 Sep;11(9):923-7. doi: 10.1007/s004649900488.
The aggressive surgical approach to patients suspected of having acute appendicitis for fear of perforation, and the inaccuracy of available diagnostic methods lead to an unacceptably high negative appendicectomy rate, especially in young women, in whom gynecological disorders frequently mimic appendicitis. Our objectives were to determine the value of diagnostic laparoscopy in women of child-bearing age to reduce the number of negative laparotomies and establish the correct diagnosis to allow prompt and appropriate treatment.
161 consecutive adult female patients under 50 years of age with a clinical diagnosis of acute appendicitis underwent diagnostic laparoscopy prior to the planned appendicectomy. If an inflamed appendix was found, appendicectomy was usually done through a muscle-splitting McBurney incision. Other diagnoses were treated accordingly. A normal appendix was not removed. Results were compared to a group of 42 similar patients in whom the laparoscopy was omitted for various reasons, to 23 postmenopausal women, and to all 137 male adults, directly operated by the McBurney approach.
After laparoscopy, 55% of the patients required appendicectomy for appendicitis while in 23% a gynecological diagnosis was made in spite of previous examination by a gynecologist. Fourteen percent had a negative laparoscopy. There were no false-negative results. The negative appendicectomy rate after laparoscopy was 5% due to two false positives and eight laparoscopy failures. In the group of fertile females who escaped laparoscopy the negative appendicectomy rate was 38%. The respective rates for postmenopausal women and men were 4% and 8%.
All women of child-bearing age suspected of having acute appendicitis should undergo diagnostic laparoscopy prior to the planned appendicectomy, regardless of the certainty of the preoperative diagnosis. This is currently the only way to reduce the negative appendicectomy rate and establish a correct diagnosis allowing prompt and appropriate treatment. In male patients and postmenopausal women one may proceed directly to emergency appendicectomy.
由于担心穿孔而对疑似患有急性阑尾炎的患者采取激进的手术方法,以及现有诊断方法的不准确,导致阴性阑尾切除率高得令人难以接受,尤其是在年轻女性中,妇科疾病常常酷似阑尾炎。我们的目的是确定诊断性腹腔镜检查在育龄妇女中的价值,以减少阴性剖腹手术的数量,并确立正确的诊断以便及时进行适当的治疗。
161例年龄在50岁以下、临床诊断为急性阑尾炎的成年女性患者,在计划进行阑尾切除术之前接受了诊断性腹腔镜检查。如果发现阑尾发炎,通常通过沿肌肉走行的麦氏切口进行阑尾切除术。其他诊断则相应进行治疗。正常阑尾不予切除。将结果与42例因各种原因未进行腹腔镜检查的类似患者、23例绝经后女性以及所有137例直接采用麦氏入路进行手术的成年男性患者进行比较。
腹腔镜检查后,55%的患者因阑尾炎需要进行阑尾切除术,而23%的患者尽管此前已由妇科医生进行过检查,但仍被诊断为妇科疾病。14%的患者腹腔镜检查结果为阴性。没有假阴性结果。由于两例假阳性和八例腹腔镜检查失败,腹腔镜检查后的阴性阑尾切除率为5%。在未进行腹腔镜检查的育龄女性组中,阴性阑尾切除率为38%。绝经后女性和男性的相应比率分别为4%和8%。
所有疑似患有急性阑尾炎的育龄妇女在计划进行阑尾切除术之前均应接受诊断性腹腔镜检查,无论术前诊断的确定性如何。这是目前降低阴性阑尾切除率并确立正确诊断以便及时进行适当治疗的唯一方法。对于男性患者和绝经后女性,可以直接进行急诊阑尾切除术。