Cox M R, McCall J L, Wilson T G, Padbury R T, Jeans P L, Toouli J
Department of Surgery, Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park, South Australia.
Aust N Z J Surg. 1993 Nov;63(11):840-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.1993.tb00357.x.
The potential advantages of laparoscopic surgery for a number of abdominal operations including appendicectomy have been heralded. In this study the aims were to assess prospectively the role of routine diagnostic laparoscopy in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis and determine the efficacy of laparoscopic appendicectomy. Patients with suspected acute appendicitis had diagnostic laparoscopy. When the diagnosis was confirmed laparoscopic appendicectomy was performed. Where an alternative diagnosis was made the appropriate treatment was instituted. If no diagnosis could be made the macroscopically normal appendix was removed by laparoscopic appendicectomy. Eighty-one patients (50 female, 31 male) had an initial diagnostic laparoscopy; 53 had appendicitis and proceeded to laparoscopic appendicectomy. A diagnosis could not be established at diagnostic laparoscopy in six patients and they also proceeded to laparoscopic appendicectomy. An alternative diagnosis was made in the remaining 22 patients (19 female and 3 male), with five proceeding to laparotomy and one patient with mesenteric adenitis having laparoscopic appendicectomy. Seven patients having laparoscopic appendicectomy required conversion to an open operation due to a retrocaecal or perforated appendix. The median operating time for successful laparoscopic appendicectomy was 55 min (range 30-95). Morbidity occurred in five of 53 patients having a successful laparoscopic appendicectomy. The median postoperative hospital stay was 2 days. The median time before return to normal activities was 8 days. Diagnostic laparoscopy is a useful diagnostic technique in women with suspected acute appendicitis, as it improves diagnostic accuracy, reduces the negative appendicectomy rate and avoids unnecessary laparotomy.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
腹腔镜手术对于包括阑尾切除术在内的多种腹部手术的潜在优势已得到宣扬。在本研究中,目的是前瞻性评估常规诊断性腹腔镜检查在急性阑尾炎诊断中的作用,并确定腹腔镜阑尾切除术的疗效。疑似急性阑尾炎的患者接受诊断性腹腔镜检查。确诊后进行腹腔镜阑尾切除术。若做出其他诊断,则采取相应治疗。若无法做出诊断,则通过腹腔镜阑尾切除术切除宏观上正常的阑尾。81例患者(50例女性,31例男性)接受了初始诊断性腹腔镜检查;53例患有阑尾炎并进行了腹腔镜阑尾切除术。6例患者在诊断性腹腔镜检查时无法确诊,他们也进行了腹腔镜阑尾切除术。其余22例患者(19例女性和3例男性)做出了其他诊断,其中5例进行了剖腹手术,1例肠系膜淋巴结炎患者进行了腹腔镜阑尾切除术。7例进行腹腔镜阑尾切除术的患者因盲肠后位或穿孔性阑尾而需要转为开放手术。成功进行腹腔镜阑尾切除术的中位手术时间为55分钟(范围30 - 95分钟)。53例成功进行腹腔镜阑尾切除术的患者中有5例发生了并发症。术后中位住院时间为2天。恢复正常活动的中位时间为8天。诊断性腹腔镜检查对于疑似急性阑尾炎的女性是一种有用的诊断技术,因为它提高了诊断准确性,降低了阴性阑尾切除率并避免了不必要的剖腹手术。(摘要截短至250字)