• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹部CT解读:误差及其原因分析

Interpretation of abdominal CT: analysis of errors and their causes.

作者信息

Bechtold R E, Chen M Y, Ott D J, Zagoria R J, Scharling E S, Wolfman N T, Vining D J

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Bowman Gray School of Medicine, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA.

出版信息

J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1997 Sep-Oct;21(5):681-5. doi: 10.1097/00004728-199709000-00001.

DOI:10.1097/00004728-199709000-00001
PMID:9294552
Abstract

PURPOSE

Our goal was to analyze those factors contributing to the error rate in the interpretation of abdominal CT scans at an academic medical center.

METHOD

From a total of 694 consecutive patients (329 male, 365 female), we evaluated the error rates of interpreting abdominal CT studies. The average patient age was 54 years. All abdominal CT studies were reviewed by three to five CT faculty radiologists on the morning after the studies were performed. The error rate was correlated with reader variability, the number of cases read per day, the presence of a resident, inpatient versus outpatient, organ systems, etc. The chi 2-test was used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 56 errors were found in the reports of 53 patients (overall error rate = 7.6%). Of these errors, 19 were judged to be clinically significant and 7 affected patient management. A statistically significant difference in error rates was noted among the five faculty radiologists (3.6-16.1%, p = 0.00062). No significant correlates between error rates and any of the other variables could be established.

CONCLUSION

The primary determinant of error rates in body CT is the skill of the interpreting radiologist.

摘要

目的

我们的目标是分析在一所学术性医学中心腹部CT扫描解读中导致错误率的那些因素。

方法

从总共694例连续患者(329例男性,365例女性)中,我们评估了腹部CT研究解读的错误率。患者平均年龄为54岁。所有腹部CT研究在检查完成后的次日上午由三至五名CT专业放射科医生进行复查。错误率与阅片者差异、每日阅片病例数、住院医师的存在、住院患者与门诊患者、器官系统等相关。采用卡方检验进行统计分析。

结果

在53例患者的报告中总共发现56处错误(总体错误率 = 7.6%)。在这些错误中,19处被判定具有临床意义,7处影响了患者的治疗管理。五名专业放射科医生之间的错误率存在统计学显著差异(3.6 - 16.1%,p = 0.00062)。错误率与任何其他变量之间均未发现显著相关性。

结论

身体CT错误率的主要决定因素是解读放射科医生的技能。

相似文献

1
Interpretation of abdominal CT: analysis of errors and their causes.腹部CT解读:误差及其原因分析
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1997 Sep-Oct;21(5):681-5. doi: 10.1097/00004728-199709000-00001.
2
Radiologists Make More Errors Interpreting Off-Hours Body CT Studies during Overnight Assignments as Compared with Daytime Assignments.放射科医生在夜间轮班期间解读非工作时间的身体 CT 研究时比在白天轮班时更容易出错。
Radiology. 2020 Nov;297(2):374-379. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020201558. Epub 2020 Aug 18.
3
Comparison of on-call radiology resident and faculty interpretation of 4- and 16-row multidetector CT pulmonary angiography with indirect CT venography.放射科住院医师与教员对4排和16排多层螺旋CT肺血管造影联合间接CT静脉造影的值班解读比较
Acad Radiol. 2008 Jan;15(1):71-6. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2007.06.030.
4
Should registrars be reporting after-hours CT scans? A calculation of error rate and the influencing factors in South Africa.住院医生是否应该报告非工作时间的CT扫描结果?南非的错误率计算及影响因素分析。
Acta Radiol. 2012 Feb 1;53(1):61-8. doi: 10.1258/ar.2011.110103.
5
MDCT of the abdomen: common misdiagnoses at a busy academic center.腹部 MDCT:繁忙学术中心的常见误诊。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Mar;194(3):660-7. doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.3280.
6
"Concordance" Revisited: A Multispecialty Appraisal of "Concordant" Preliminary Abdominopelvic CT Reports.再谈“一致性”:对“一致的”腹部盆腔CT初步报告的多专业评估
J Am Coll Radiol. 2016 Sep;13(9):1111-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2016.04.019. Epub 2016 Jun 20.
7
Preliminary interpretations of after-hours CT and sonography by radiology residents versus final interpretations by body imaging radiologists at a level 1 trauma center.一级创伤中心放射科住院医师对非工作时间CT和超声的初步解读与身体影像放射科医师的最终解读对比
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003 Aug;181(2):367-73. doi: 10.2214/ajr.181.2.1810367.
8
The accuracy of interpretation of emergency abdominal CT in adult patients who present with non-traumatic abdominal pain: results of a UK national audit.成年非创伤性腹痛患者急诊腹部CT解读的准确性:一项英国全国性审计结果
Clin Radiol. 2017 Jan;72(1):41-51. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2016.10.008. Epub 2016 Dec 5.
9
Comparison of discrepancy rates in resident and faculty interpretations of on-call PE CT and V/Q scans: is one study more reliable during off hours?在急诊 CT 和 V/Q 扫描的住院医生和教授解读中差异率的比较:在非工作时间一项研究是否更可靠?
J Am Coll Radiol. 2011 Jun;8(6):415-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2010.12.012.
10
Can independent coronal multiplanar reformatted images obtained using state-of-the-art MDCT scanners be used for primary interpretation of MDCT of the abdomen and pelvis? A feasibility study.使用最先进的多层螺旋CT(MDCT)扫描仪获得的独立冠状多平面重组图像能否用于腹部和骨盆MDCT的初步解读?一项可行性研究。
Eur J Radiol. 2007 Dec;64(3):439-46. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2007.03.002. Epub 2007 Apr 3.

引用本文的文献

1
AI in radiological imaging of soft-tissue and bone tumours: a systematic review evaluating against CLAIM and FUTURE-AI guidelines.人工智能在软组织和骨肿瘤放射成像中的应用:一项对照CLAIM和FUTURE-AI指南进行评估的系统综述
EBioMedicine. 2025 Apr;114:105642. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2025.105642. Epub 2025 Mar 20.
2
Clinical information on imaging referrals for suspected or known axial spondyloarthritis: recommendations from the Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS).疑似或已知中轴型脊柱关节炎影像学转诊的临床信息:来自脊柱关节炎评估协会(ASAS)的建议。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2024 Nov 14;83(12):1636-1643. doi: 10.1136/ard-2024-226280.
3
Discrepancy rate and clinical impact of preliminary reports from radiology residents.
放射科住院医师初步报告的差异率及临床影响。
Heliyon. 2023 Jul 27;9(8):e18714. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18714. eCollection 2023 Aug.
4
Individualized and generalized models for predicting observer performance on liver metastasis detection using CT.使用CT预测肝脏转移瘤检测中观察者表现的个体化和通用模型。
J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2022 Sep;9(5):055501. doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.9.5.055501. Epub 2022 Sep 13.
5
Mandating Limits on Workload, Duty, and Speed in Radiology.强制限制放射科的工作量、工作时间和工作速度。
Radiology. 2022 Aug;304(2):274-282. doi: 10.1148/radiol.212631. Epub 2022 Jun 14.
6
Internet of Medical Things: An Effective and Fully Automatic IoT Approach Using Deep Learning and Fine-Tuning to Lung CT Segmentation.医疗物联网:一种使用深度学习和微调进行肺部 CT 分割的有效全自动 IoT 方法。
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Nov 24;20(23):6711. doi: 10.3390/s20236711.
7
The Back Alleys and Dark Corners of Abdomen and Pelvis Computed Tomography: The Most Frequent Sites of Missed Findings in the Multiplanar Era.腹部和盆腔计算机断层扫描的隐蔽区域:多平面时代漏诊的常见部位
J Clin Imaging Sci. 2020 Nov 2;10:70. doi: 10.25259/JCIS_184_2020. eCollection 2020.
8
Added value of double reading in diagnostic radiology,a systematic review.诊断放射学中双重读片的附加值:一项系统综述
Insights Imaging. 2018 Jun;9(3):287-301. doi: 10.1007/s13244-018-0599-0. Epub 2018 Mar 28.
9
Variability in Observer Performance Between Faculty Members and Residents Using Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS)-Ultrasound, Fifth Edition (2013).使用《乳腺影像报告和数据系统(BI-RADS)-超声》第五版(2013年)时,教员与住院医师之间观察者表现的差异
Iran J Radiol. 2016 Jan 9;13(3):e28281. doi: 10.5812/iranjradiol.28281. eCollection 2016 Jul.
10
Trauma whole-body MDCT: an assessment of image quality in conventional dual-phase and modified biphasic injection.创伤全身MDCT:传统双期和改良双相注射的图像质量评估
Br J Radiol. 2016 Jul;89(1063):20160160. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20160160. Epub 2016 May 17.