González de Dios J, Moya Benavent M, Izura Azanza V, Pastore Olmedo C
Servicio de Pediatría, Hospital Universitario San Juan, Alicante.
An Esp Pediatr. 1997 Jun;46(6):597-602.
The objective of this study was to analyze the usefulness of electrophysiological studies [electroencephalogram (EEG) and auditory-evoked potential (AEP)] during the follow-up of children with perinatal asphyxia antecedents.
A prospective epidemiological study of perinatal asphyxia in term neonates born at the University Hospital San Juan (Alicante, Spain) between November 1991 and February 1995 was performed. Perinatal asphyxia was graded as non-severe (1 minute Apgar score < or = 6 and/or umbilical artery pH < 7.20, with abnormal fetal heart patterns and/or meconium-stained amniotic fluid and the need for immediate neonatal resuscitation) and severe (1 minute Apgar score < or = 3 and umbilical artery pH < 7.10). The incidence of hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (classification of Levene and Sarnat & Sarnat) during the neonatal period and neurological sequelae (classification of Finer and Amiel-Tison) during the follow-up period were studied. Electrophysiological studies (EEG and AEP) were made mainly between 12 and 18 months of life.
During the study period there were 156 cases of perinatal asphyxia in full-term live births (31 severe and 125 non-severe). Hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy was present in 25.6% of asphyxiated newborn infants, being mild in 30 cases, moderate in 5 and severe in 5. The incidence of neurological sequelae in 115 asphyxiated newborns followed for 24 month was 16.5%. This included mainly motor disabilities. We did not find any case of epilepsy, but there were 4 children with febrile seizures and one case of benign myoclonic seizures. EEG was performed in 88 cases during follow-up, and only was abnormal in two infants without seizures. AEP was performed in 82 cases during follow-up and hearing loss was detected in 4 children with neurosensorial hypoacusia (3 unilateral and 1 bilateral).
Rutinary EEG is not useful during follow-up of children with antecedents of perinatal asphyxia. However, AEP is a hearing screening procedure for infants at risk of deafness, such as in perinatal asphyxia, and the cases of neurosensorial hearing loss detected by AEP in our population were clinically unapparent.
本研究的目的是分析电生理检查[脑电图(EEG)和听觉诱发电位(AEP)]在有围产期窒息病史儿童随访中的作用。
对1991年11月至1995年2月在西班牙阿利坎特圣胡安大学医院出生的足月新生儿围产期窒息进行了一项前瞻性流行病学研究。围产期窒息分为非重度(1分钟阿氏评分≤6分和/或脐动脉pH<7.20,伴有异常胎心图形和/或羊水胎粪污染以及需要立即进行新生儿复苏)和重度(1分钟阿氏评分≤3分且脐动脉pH<7.10)。研究了新生儿期缺氧缺血性脑病(Levene和Sarnat&Sarnat分类)的发生率以及随访期神经后遗症(Finer和Amiel-Tison分类)的发生率。电生理检查(EEG和AEP)主要在12至18个月龄时进行。
在研究期间,足月活产中有156例围产期窒息病例(31例重度和125例非重度)。25.6%的窒息新生儿存在缺氧缺血性脑病,其中轻度30例,中度5例,重度5例。115例窒息新生儿随访24个月时神经后遗症的发生率为16.5%。主要包括运动障碍。未发现癫痫病例,但有4例儿童发生热性惊厥,1例为良性肌阵挛性惊厥。随访期间88例进行了EEG检查,仅2例无惊厥婴儿EEG异常。随访期间82例进行了AEP检查,4例患有感音神经性听力减退的儿童(3例单侧,1例双侧)检测到听力损失。
常规EEG在有围产期窒息病史儿童的随访中无作用。然而,AEP是对有耳聋风险婴儿的听力筛查程序,如在围产期窒息中,我们研究人群中通过AEP检测到的感音神经性听力损失病例在临床上并不明显。