• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

河狸的同胞识别:表型匹配的实地测试

Sibling recognition in the beaver: a field test for phenotype matching.

作者信息

Sun L, MÜLLER-SCHWARZE D

机构信息

Department of Biology, College of Environmental Science and Forestry, State University of New York

出版信息

Anim Behav. 1997 Sep;54(3):493-502. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1996.0440.

DOI:10.1006/anbe.1996.0440
PMID:9299035
Abstract

The hypothesis of kin recognition by phenotype matching predicts that relatives can be identified without previous contact, and/or that cues used for recognition can be learned indirectly from a third but related individual. This hypothesis was tested in the field using 22 beaver, Castor canadensisfamilies. Individually identifiable beavers were provided with a two-way choice between two experimental scent mounds, one of which was scented with the anal gland secretion (AGS) from an unfamiliar sibling of the test subjects, the other with AGS from an unfamiliar non-relative. Beavers showed less strong territorial responses to AGS from their siblings than to that from non-relatives. The mates of the test subjects, which were not related to, or familiar with, either of the AGS donors, also responded less strongly to the AGS from their mates' siblings than to that from other unfamiliar non-relatives. This discrimination was not shown when castoreum samples were tested instead of AGS. Therefore, it was concluded that (1) information about kinship in the beaver is coded in the AGS but not in the castoreum, (2) the mechanism of phenotype matching is used in beaver sibling recognition, and (3) the cue used in phenotype matching can be learned and used for recognition of related individuals by an unrelated individual.1997The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour

摘要

通过表型匹配进行亲缘识别的假说预测,亲属可以在没有先前接触的情况下被识别出来,和/或用于识别的线索可以间接地从第三个但有亲缘关系的个体那里学到。该假说在野外使用22个海狸家族(加拿大海狸)进行了测试。为个体可识别的海狸提供了在两个实验气味土堆之间的双向选择,其中一个用测试对象不熟悉的同胞的肛门腺分泌物(AGS)加香,另一个用不熟悉的非亲属的AGS加香。与对非亲属的AGS相比,海狸对来自其同胞的AGS表现出较弱的领地反应。测试对象的配偶,它们与AGS供体中的任何一个都没有亲缘关系或不熟悉,对来自其配偶同胞的AGS的反应也比对其他不熟悉的非亲属的反应弱。当用海狸香样本而不是AGS进行测试时,没有显示出这种区分。因此,得出的结论是:(1)海狸中关于亲缘关系的信息编码在AGS中,而不在海狸香中;(2)表型匹配机制用于海狸同胞识别;(3)表型匹配中使用的线索可以被学习,并被无亲缘关系的个体用于识别相关个体。1997动物行为研究协会

相似文献

1
Sibling recognition in the beaver: a field test for phenotype matching.河狸的同胞识别:表型匹配的实地测试
Anim Behav. 1997 Sep;54(3):493-502. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1996.0440.
2
Odorant source used in Eurasian beaver territory marking.欧亚河狸领地标记中使用的气味源。
J Chem Ecol. 2001 Dec;27(12):2471-91. doi: 10.1023/a:1013627515232.
3
Do Eurasian beavers smear their pelage with castoreum and anal gland secretion?欧亚海狸会用海狸香和肛门腺分泌物涂抹它们的皮毛吗?
J Chem Ecol. 2002 Aug;28(8):1697-701. doi: 10.1023/a:1019954020963.
4
Pheromonal activity of single castoreum constituents in beaver,Castor canadensis.单离獐子香成分在海狸,海狸鼠中的信息素活性。
J Chem Ecol. 1991 Apr;17(4):715-34. doi: 10.1007/BF00994195.
5
Beaver response to recurrent alien scents: scent fence or scent match?海狸对反复出现的外来气味的反应:气味围栏还是气味匹配?
Anim Behav. 1998 Jun;55(6):1529-36. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1997.0709.
6
Kin recognition in golden hamsters: evidence for kinship odours.金黄地鼠的亲缘识别:亲属气味的证据。
Anim Behav. 1998 Feb;55(2):377-86. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1997.0611.
7
Experimental habitat scenting inhibits colonization by beaver,Castor canadensis.实验栖息地气味处理抑制了海狸(Castor canadensis)的定殖。
J Chem Ecol. 1989 Mar;15(3):887-93. doi: 10.1007/BF01015184.
8
Odour-based kin discrimination in the cooperatively breeding meerkat.基于气味的合作繁殖猫鼬的亲缘关系识别。
Biol Lett. 2012 Dec 12;9(1):20121054. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2012.1054. Print 2013 Feb 23.
9
Castor sacs and anal glands of the north american beaver (Castor canadensis): their histology, development, and relationship to scent communication.北美的海狸(Castor canadensis)的麝鼠袋和肛门腺:它们的组织学、发育和与气味通讯的关系。
J Chem Ecol. 1982 May;8(5):809-19. doi: 10.1007/BF00994781.
10
Kin recognition in golden hamsters: evidence for phenotype matching.金黄仓鼠的亲缘识别:表型匹配的证据。
Anim Behav. 1998 Aug;56(2):409-417. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1998.0747.

引用本文的文献

1
Brown bear skin-borne secretions display evidence of individuality and age-sex variation.棕熊皮肤分泌物显示出个体和年龄性别差异的证据。
Sci Rep. 2023 Feb 23;13(1):3163. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-29479-y.
2
Divergence in male sexual odor signal and genetics across populations of the red mason bee, Osmia bicornis, in Europe.欧洲两支红熊蜂种群雄性性信息素信号和遗传分化。
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 22;13(2):e0193153. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193153. eCollection 2018.
3
The importance of the altricial - precocial spectrum for social complexity in mammals and birds - a review.
哺乳动物和鸟类中发育不全-早熟谱系对社会复杂性的重要性——综述
Front Zool. 2017 Jan 18;14:3. doi: 10.1186/s12983-016-0185-6. eCollection 2017.
4
Male rhesus macaques use vocalizations to distinguish female maternal, but not paternal, kin from non-kin.雄性恒河猴通过发声来区分母系亲属与非亲属,但无法区分父系亲属与非亲属。
Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2015;69(10):1677-1686. doi: 10.1007/s00265-015-1979-9. Epub 2015 Jul 28.
5
Odour-based kin discrimination in the cooperatively breeding meerkat.基于气味的合作繁殖猫鼬的亲缘关系识别。
Biol Lett. 2012 Dec 12;9(1):20121054. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2012.1054. Print 2013 Feb 23.
6
Sequence variations at the human leukocyte antigen-linked olfactory receptor cluster do not influence female preferences for male odors.人类白细胞抗原相关嗅觉受体簇的序列变异不会影响女性对男性气味的偏好。
Hum Immunol. 2010 Jan;71(1):100-3. doi: 10.1016/j.humimm.2009.10.004.
7
Kin discrimination and altruism in the larvae of a solitary insect.独居昆虫幼虫的亲缘识别与利他行为
Proc Biol Sci. 2006 Sep 22;273(1599):2381-6. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2006.3598.
8
Odorant source used in Eurasian beaver territory marking.欧亚河狸领地标记中使用的气味源。
J Chem Ecol. 2001 Dec;27(12):2471-91. doi: 10.1023/a:1013627515232.
9
Paternal relatedness and age proximity regulate social relationships among adult female rhesus macaques.父系亲缘关系和年龄相近程度调节成年雌性恒河猴之间的社会关系。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Nov 20;98(24):13769-73. doi: 10.1073/pnas.241210198. Epub 2001 Nov 6.